Extinction risks and mitigation for a megaherbivore, the giraffe, in a human‐influenced landscape under climate change

Megaherbivores play “outsized” roles in ecosystem functioning but are vulnerable to human impacts such as overhunting, land‐use changes, and climate extremes. However, such impacts—and combinations of these impacts—on population dynamics are rarely examined using empirical data. To guide effective c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2023-12, Vol.29 (23), p.6693-6712
Hauptverfasser: Bond, Monica L., Lee, Derek E., Paniw, Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Megaherbivores play “outsized” roles in ecosystem functioning but are vulnerable to human impacts such as overhunting, land‐use changes, and climate extremes. However, such impacts—and combinations of these impacts—on population dynamics are rarely examined using empirical data. To guide effective conservation actions under increasing global‐change pressures, we developed a socially structured individual‐based model (IBM) using long‐term demographic data from female giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) in a human‐influenced landscape in northern Tanzania, the Tarangire Ecosystem. This unfenced system includes savanna habitats with a wide gradient of anthropogenic pressures, from national parks, a wildlife ranch and community conservation areas, to unprotected village lands. We then simulated and projected over 50 years how realistic environmental and land‐use management changes might affect this metapopulation of female giraffes. Scenarios included: (1) anthropogenic land‐use changes including roads and agricultural/urban expansion; (2) reduction or improvement in wildlife law enforcement measures; (3) changes in populations of natural predators and migratory alternative prey; and (4) increases in rainfall as predicted for East Africa. The factor causing the greatest risk of rapid declines in female giraffe abundance in our simulations was a reduction in law enforcement leading to more poaching. Other threats decreased abundances of giraffes, but improving law enforcement in both of the study area's protected areas mitigated these impacts: a 0.01 increase in giraffe survival probability from improved law enforcement mitigated a 25% rise in heavy rainfall events by increasing abundance 19%, and mitigated the expansion of towns and blockage of dispersal movements by increasing abundance 22%. Our IBM enabled us to further quantify fine‐scale abundance changes among female giraffe social communities, revealing potential source–sink interactions within the metapopulation. This flexible methodology can be adapted to test additional ecological questions in this landscape, or to model populations of giraffes or other species in different ecosystems. This study combined the information learned from previous studies of giraffes to create an individual‐based model that simulated realistic population dynamics and extinction risk under different scenarios of environmental change over 50 years. Results showed that the greatest risk of population declines and extinction for
ISSN:1354-1013
1365-2486
DOI:10.1111/gcb.16970