Performance of the 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score (4PEPS) in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism: An external validation study

The recently published 4-level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score (4PEPS) integrates different aspects from currently available diagnostic strategies to further reduce imaging testing in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). To externally validate the performance of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thrombosis research 2023-11, Vol.231, p.65-75
Hauptverfasser: Stals, Milou A.M., Beenen, Ludo F.M., Coppens, Michiel, Faber, Laura M., Hofstee, Herman M.A., Hovens, Marcel M.C., Huisman, Menno V., van der Hulle, Tom, Kaasjager, Karin A.H., Kruip, Marieke J.H.A., Mairuhu, Albert T.A., Middeldorp, Saskia, ten Wolde, Marije, Klok, Frederikus A., van Es, Nick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The recently published 4-level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score (4PEPS) integrates different aspects from currently available diagnostic strategies to further reduce imaging testing in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). To externally validate the performance of 4PEPS in an independent cohort. In this post-hoc analysis of the prospective diagnostic management YEARS study, the primary outcome measures were discrimination, calibration, efficiency (proportion of imaging tests potentially avoided), and failure rate (venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnosis at baseline or follow-up in patients with a negative 4PEPS algorithm). Multiple imputation was used for missing 4PEPS items. Based on 4PEPS, PE was considered ruled out in patients with a very low clinical pre-test probability (CPTP) without D-dimer testing, in patients with a low CPTP and D-dimer
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.09.010