Geometric and dosimetric analysis of CT- and MR-based automatic contouring for the EPTN contouring atlas in neuro-oncology

[Display omitted] •Automatic contouring for radiotherapy is evaluated for neuro-oncology patients.•Organs-at-risk from the EPTN consensus-based atlas were used.•MR-based deep-learning contouring outperformed MR atlas-based contouring.•MR-based deep-learning and CT-based atlas contouring enable high-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physica medica 2023-10, Vol.114, p.103156-103156, Article 103156
Hauptverfasser: Vaassen, Femke, Zegers, Catharina M.L., Hofstede, David, Wubbels, Mart, Beurskens, Hilde, Verheesen, Lindsey, Canters, Richard, Looney, Padraig, Battye, Michael, Gooding, Mark J., Compter, Inge, Eekers, Daniëlle B.P., van Elmpt, Wouter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Automatic contouring for radiotherapy is evaluated for neuro-oncology patients.•Organs-at-risk from the EPTN consensus-based atlas were used.•MR-based deep-learning contouring outperformed MR atlas-based contouring.•MR-based deep-learning and CT-based atlas contouring enable high-quality contouring.•This work adds to evidence of using deep-learning methods in clinical practice. Atlas-based and deep-learning contouring (DLC) are methods for automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs). The European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) published a consensus-based atlas for delineation of OARs in neuro-oncology. In this study, geometric and dosimetric evaluation of automatically-segmented neuro-oncological OARs was performed using CT- and MR-models following the EPTN-contouring atlas. Image and contouring data from 76 neuro-oncological patients were included. Two atlas-based models (CT-atlas and MR-atlas) and one DLC-model (MR-DLC) were created. Manual contours on registered CT-MR-images were used as ground-truth. Results were analyzed in terms of geometrical (volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (vDSC), surface DSC (sDSC), added path length (APL), and mean slice-wise Hausdorff distance (MSHD)) and dosimetrical accuracy. Distance-to-tumor analysis was performed to analyze to which extent the location of the OAR relative to planning target volume (PTV) has dosimetric impact, using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. CT-atlas outperformed MR-atlas for 22/26 OARs. MR-DLC outperformed MR-atlas for all OARs. Highest median (95 %CI) vDSC and sDSC were found for the brainstem in MR-DLC: 0.92 (0.88–0.95) and 0.84 (0.77–0.89) respectively, as well as lowest MSHD: 0.27 (0.22–0.39)cm. Median dose differences (ΔD) were within ± 1 Gy for 24/26(92 %) OARs for all three models. Distance-to-tumor showed a significant correlation for ΔDmax,0.03cc-parameters when splitting the data in ≤ 4 cm and > 4 cm OAR-distance (p 
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103156