Comparison of Tympanostomy Tubes Under Local Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia for Children

Objective Tympanostomy tube insertion (TTI) is typically accomplished under general anesthesia (GA) in the operating room. We aimed to compare pain between GA and local anesthesia (LA) in surgically naïve children undergoing TTI. Secondary objectives examined patient's quality of life (QoL) and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2024-05, Vol.134 (5), p.2422-2429
Hauptverfasser: Fournier, Isabelle, Caron, Camille, McMurtry, C. Meghan, Lapointe, Annie, Giguere, Chantal, Doré‐Bergeron, Marie‐Joëlle, Bergeron, Mathieu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Tympanostomy tube insertion (TTI) is typically accomplished under general anesthesia (GA) in the operating room. We aimed to compare pain between GA and local anesthesia (LA) in surgically naïve children undergoing TTI. Secondary objectives examined patient's quality of life (QoL) and parent's satisfaction. Study Design Prospective single‐center study. Setting Tertiary pediatric academic center. Methods Consecutive children who underwent TTI under GA were compared to patients under LA. Pain standardized observational pain scales (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale [FLACC], Children's hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale [CHEOPS]) were completed pre‐procedure, during the first tympanostomy and second tympanostomy, and post‐procedure, as well as 1 week postoperatively. General health‐related QoL (PedsQL) and QoL specific to otitis media (OM‐6) were measured before insertion and 1 month postoperatively. Parental satisfaction was also evaluated using a qualitative scale. Results LA group had statistically significant higher pain levels at the beginning (7.3 vs. 0), during the first tympanostomy (7.8 vs. 0), during the second tympanostomy (7.7 vs. 0), and at end of the procedure (6.9 vs. 0) with the FLACC scale (all p  0.05). Minor complication occurred at a similar rate (p > 0.05). Parents were equally satisfied with their choice of anesthesia in both groups when initially questioned after the procedure (p > 0.05). Conclusions Children experienced significantly less pain under GA than LA. If LA is to be used, pain and distress‐reducing strategies are critical. Shared decision‐making with families is essential. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 134:2422–2429, 2024
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.31095