Experiences from the ARGOS user group nuclear emergency exercise

The Accident Reporting and Guiding Operational System (ARGOS) is a decision support system used to assist in the Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) to nuclear and radiological incidents. The ARGOS user group has been formed that is made up of government agencies across many countries that hav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental radioactivity 2023-12, Vol.270, p.107298-107298, Article 107298
Hauptverfasser: Orr, Blake, Hac-Heimburg, Agnieszka, Ul Hasan Syed, Naeem, Blixt Buhr, Anna Maria, Ribeiro, Laura, Bergman, Lauren, Ryan, Robert, Jaroszek, Adam, Ow, Geraldine, Dac Dung, Bui, Pehrsson, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Accident Reporting and Guiding Operational System (ARGOS) is a decision support system used to assist in the Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) to nuclear and radiological incidents. The ARGOS user group has been formed that is made up of government agencies across many countries that have a role in EPR to nuclear and radiological incidents. In 2020, a desktop exercise was organised for the members of the ARGOS user group. The exercise involved two hypothetical accidents at different times on the same date, namely a radiological release from a floating nuclear power plant (NPP) off the Norwegian coast and from the Loviisa NPP in Finland. The objectives of the exercise were to train and increase knowledge of the ARGOS system, to perform a comparison of model outputs, and to compare the recommendations of protective actions. In the case of the floating NPP the source term was provided, while in the Loviisa NPP scenario the participants were required to provide their own source term based on a description of the accident. The results on radiological consequences based on dispersion modelling, protective actions, source terms and dispersion modelling settings were collected from participants. A comparison was made between each of these reported aspects. In general, it was found that there was general agreement between the results for the floating nuclear power plant scenario in the sense of plume direction and extent, while in the case of the Loviisa NPP scenario, there was much greater variation, with the difference in source term estimates between the participants being an influencing factor. The participants acknowledged that taking part in an exercise of this nature increased their knowledge and understanding about using decision support tools such as ARGOS in planning and responding to nuclear and radiological emergencies. •Desktop exercise based on hypothetical nuclear emergency scenarios.•ARGOS Decision support system used for the exercise.•Simulation of radiological consequences using atmospheric dispersion models.•Comparison of factors influencing the resulting radiological consequences.•Suggested improvement to the ARGOS system have been identified as a result of this exercise.
ISSN:0265-931X
1879-1700
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107298