Dynamic Response of Three Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite Bridges

Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite bridge decks are gaining the attention of bridge owners because of their light self-weight, corrosion resistance, and ease of installation. Constructed Facilities Center at West Virginia University working with the Federal Highway Administration and West Virg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bridge engineering 2005-11, Vol.10 (6), p.722-730
Hauptverfasser: Aluri, Srinivas, Jinka, Chandrashekar, GangaRao, Hota V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite bridge decks are gaining the attention of bridge owners because of their light self-weight, corrosion resistance, and ease of installation. Constructed Facilities Center at West Virginia University working with the Federal Highway Administration and West Virginia Department of Transportation has developed three different FRP decking systems and installed several FRP deck bridges in West Virginia. These FRP bridge decks are lighter in weight than comparable concrete systems and therefore their dynamic performance is equally as important as their static performance. In the current study dynamic tests were performed on three FRP deck bridges, namely, Katy Truss Bridge, Market Street Bridge, and Laurel Lick Bridge, in the state of West Virginia. The dynamic response parameters evaluated for the three bridges include dynamic load allowance (DLA) factors, natural frequencies, damping ratios, and deck accelerations caused by moving test trucks. It was found that the DLA factors for Katy Truss and Market Street bridges are within the AASHTO 1998 LRFD specifications, but the deck accelerations were found to be high for both these bridges. DLA factors for Laurel Lick bridge were found to be as high as 93% against the typical design value of 33%; however absolute deck stress induced by vehicle loads is less than 10% of the deck ultimate stress.
ISSN:1084-0702
1943-5592
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:6(722)