Impact of baseline and interim quantitative PET parameters on outcomes of classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Currently, analysis of interim PET (iPET) according to the Deauville score (DS) is the most important predictive factor in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL); however, there is room for improvement in its prognostic power. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of quantitative PET analysis (maximum st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of hematology 2024, Vol.103 (1), p.175-183
Hauptverfasser: Santos, Fernanda Maria, Marin, Jose Flavio Gomes, Lima, Marcos Santos, Silva-Junior, Wellington Fernandes, Alves, Lucas Bassolli O., Moreira, Frederico R., Velasques, Rodrigo Dolphini, Atanazio, Marcelo Junqueira, Maia, Ana Carolina Arrais, Buchpiguel, Carlos A., Buccheri, Valeria, Rocha, Vanderson
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Currently, analysis of interim PET (iPET) according to the Deauville score (DS) is the most important predictive factor in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL); however, there is room for improvement in its prognostic power. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of quantitative PET analysis (maximum standard uptake value [SUV max ], total metabolic tumor volume [TMTV] and total lesion glicolysis [TLG]) at baseline (PET0) and iPET in a retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed classical HL. For positive iPET (+ iPET), the reduction of quantitative parameters in relation to PET0 (ΔSUV max , ΔTMTV and ΔTLG) was calculated. Between 2011 and 2017, 234 patients treated with ABVD were analyzed. Median age was 30 years-old, 59% had advanced stage disease, 57% a bulky mass and 25% a + iPET (DS 4–5). At baseline, high TLG was associated with an increased cumulative incidence of failure (CIF) ( p  = 0.032) while neither SUV max , TMTV or TLG were associated with overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis, only iPET was associated with CIF ( p  
ISSN:0939-5555
1432-0584
DOI:10.1007/s00277-023-05461-6