Comparative study of concurrent conventional chemoradiotherapy versus hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme postoperative patients

Purpose: To assess the treatment response and toxicity profile among two groups of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) postoperative patients receiving conventional radiotherapy (RT) versus hypofractionated RT with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) in both. Materials and Methods: A total of 50...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and therapeutics 2023-07, Vol.19 (5), p.1126-1130
Hauptverfasser: Khatri, Naresh, Kumar, H, Sharma, Neeti, Jakhar, Shankar, Dhaka, Saroj
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To assess the treatment response and toxicity profile among two groups of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) postoperative patients receiving conventional radiotherapy (RT) versus hypofractionated RT with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) in both. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 patients randomly allotted into two arms (25 in each). Dose received 60 Gy (2 Gy/#) in conventional fractionation RT versus 50 Gy (2.5 Gy/#) in hypofractionated RT with concurrent TMZ 75 mg/m2 orally daily in both arms, respectively. Follow-up was done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of treatment to evaluate toxicities, treatment response, and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: All patients were well tolerated with treatment; no major adverse effects were monitored in two arms. There was no statistical significant difference in treatment response, which was found 64% versus 60% in arm A and arm B, respectively, at 3 months of follow-up (P = 0.768). Toxicity profiles were also noted similar in both arms. The 6-month PFS was 84% and 80% in arm A and arm B, respectively (P = 0.71) and 12-month PFS was 60% and 52% in arm A and arm B, respectively (P = 0.69). Conclusion: Among the patients followed, this study showed that hypofractionated RT regimen was not inferior to conventional RT regimen.
ISSN:0973-1482
1998-4138
DOI:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_594_21