Effectiveness and safety of Xingbei Zhike granules in patients with postinfectious cough: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

Postinfectious cough (PIC) is a common symptom following a respiratory tract infection. Xingbei Zhike (XBZK) granules, a Chinese patent medicine, has been widely used for PIC in clinics. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness. To investigate whether treatment with XBZK granules is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phytomedicine (Stuttgart) 2023-12, Vol.121, p.155103-155103, Article 155103
Hauptverfasser: Chi, Yihe, Lin, Lin, Guo, Xin, Xiao, Jingmin, Fan, Feiting, Yu, Changli, Xue, Hanrong, Li, Suyun, Guo, Dongwei, Liu, Lei, Wang, Yaoyong, Ma, Xiao, Pang, Jianguo, Wang, Jincheng, Zhao, Zhiying, Zhao, Xianping, Wang, Guangen, Gu, Dongwei, Zhen, Hui, Chen, Hongping, Ding, Junping, Zhou, Mingjuan, Wu, Zhenhu, Han, Yun, Chen, Yuanbin, Wu, Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Postinfectious cough (PIC) is a common symptom following a respiratory tract infection. Xingbei Zhike (XBZK) granules, a Chinese patent medicine, has been widely used for PIC in clinics. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness. To investigate whether treatment with XBZK granules is effective for PIC. A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible participants from fourteen hospitals were randomly assigned in 3:1 ratio to receive either XBZK granules or placebo for 14 days. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of a visual analogue scale (VAS) for cough symptoms. Secondary outcomes included cough symptom score (CSS), time and probability of recovery from cough, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome score, relief rates of individual symptoms, Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score, and the use of reliever drug. A total of 235 patients (176 in XBZK and 59 in placebo groups) were included in the analysis. The AUC for cough VAS scores was lower in the XBZK than placebo group (−8.10, 95 % CI -14.12 to −2.07, p = 0.009), indicating superiority. XBZK decreased CSS (−0.68 points, 95 % CI −1.13 to −0.22, p = 0.01), shortened time to cough recovery (−2 days, hazard ratio [HR] 1.48, 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.13, p = 0.02), enhanced the probability of cough recovery (risk ratio [RR] 1.66, 95 % CI 1.07 to 2.58, p = 0.03), lowered TCM syndrome score (−0.99 points, 95 % CI −1.58 to −0.40, p = 0.004), increased the rate of daytime (RR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.07 to 3.15, p = 0.02) and nighttime (RR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.29 to 3.35, p = 0.004) cough recovery, and reduced the viscosity of sputum (RR 2.92, 95 % CI 1.66 to 5.13, p 
ISSN:0944-7113
1618-095X
DOI:10.1016/j.phymed.2023.155103