Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body
To evaluate the accuracy of the scans of the combined healing abutment-scan body (CHA-SB) system located at different sites of the maxilla when SBs are replaced in between each scan. Three SBs were seated into HAs located at the central incisor, first premolar, and first molar sites of a maxillary m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 2023-12, Vol.139, p.104716-104716, Article 104716 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 104716 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 104716 |
| container_title | Journal of dentistry |
| container_volume | 139 |
| creator | Donmez, Mustafa Borga Güven, Mehmet Esad Yılmaz, Deniz Abou-Ayash, Samir Çakmak, Gülce Yilmaz, Burak |
| description | To evaluate the accuracy of the scans of the combined healing abutment-scan body (CHA-SB) system located at different sites of the maxilla when SBs are replaced in between each scan.
Three SBs were seated into HAs located at the central incisor, first premolar, and first molar sites of a maxillary model inside a phantom head, and the model was scanned extraorally (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2). This procedure was repeated with new SBs until a total of 10 scans were performed. Standard tessellation language files of CHA-SBs at each implant location were isolated, transferred into analysis software (Geomagic Control X), and superimposed over the proprietary library files to analyze surface (root mean square), linear, and angular deviations. Trueness and precision were evaluated with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests. The correlation between surface and angular deviations was analyzed with Pearson's correlation (α=0.05).
Molar implant scans had the highest surface and angular deviations (P≤.006), while central incisor implant scans had higher precision (surface deviations) than premolar implant scans (P=.041). Premolar implant scans had higher accuracy than central incisor implant scans on the y-axis (P≤.029). Central incisor implant scans had the highest accuracy on the z-axis (P≤.018). A strong positive correlation was observed between surface and angular deviations (r = 0.864, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104716 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2868128553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571223003020</els_id><sourcerecordid>2868128553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-13b176bd1a401384d0675287321ba393e7568f082590178c033eee385526b4263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3DAURkVpaSZJn6BQtOzG0yvJtuRFFyWkPxDIJoXshCxdNxps2ZXkknmRPm81M2m7y0pwOff7dDmEvGWwZcDaD7vtzmHIWw5clEktWfuCbJiSXcVke_-SbEAAVI1k_Iycp7QDgBp495qcCSlFB43ckN93ccWAKVETHF0iWp_8HOg8UDtPvQ_o6AOa0Ycf1PRrnkojTdYE2s9uT9M-ZZyOg5KQqfPDgPHI-IzpEDOZRz-OhpohY6TTOma_jEgjLnNhStchunD5Af8HX5JXgxkTvnl6L8j3z9d3V1-rm9sv364-3VS2hjpXTPTl1N4xUwMTqnbQyoYrKTjrjegEyqZVAyjedMCksiAEIgrVNLzta96KC_L-lLvE-eeKKevJJ4vlvwHnNWmuWsV44UVBxQm1cU4p4qCX6CcT95qBPgjRO30Uog9C9ElI2Xr3VLD2E7p_O38NFODjCcBy5i-PUSfrMVh0vsjI2s3-2YI_K7ielQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2868128553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Donmez, Mustafa Borga ; Güven, Mehmet Esad ; Yılmaz, Deniz ; Abou-Ayash, Samir ; Çakmak, Gülce ; Yilmaz, Burak</creator><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Mustafa Borga ; Güven, Mehmet Esad ; Yılmaz, Deniz ; Abou-Ayash, Samir ; Çakmak, Gülce ; Yilmaz, Burak</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the accuracy of the scans of the combined healing abutment-scan body (CHA-SB) system located at different sites of the maxilla when SBs are replaced in between each scan.
Three SBs were seated into HAs located at the central incisor, first premolar, and first molar sites of a maxillary model inside a phantom head, and the model was scanned extraorally (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2). This procedure was repeated with new SBs until a total of 10 scans were performed. Standard tessellation language files of CHA-SBs at each implant location were isolated, transferred into analysis software (Geomagic Control X), and superimposed over the proprietary library files to analyze surface (root mean square), linear, and angular deviations. Trueness and precision were evaluated with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests. The correlation between surface and angular deviations was analyzed with Pearson's correlation (α=0.05).
Molar implant scans had the highest surface and angular deviations (P≤.006), while central incisor implant scans had higher precision (surface deviations) than premolar implant scans (P=.041). Premolar implant scans had higher accuracy than central incisor implant scans on the y-axis (P≤.029). Central incisor implant scans had the highest accuracy on the z-axis (P≤.018). A strong positive correlation was observed between surface and angular deviations (r = 0.864, P<.001).
Central incisor implant scans mostly had high accuracy and molar implant scans mostly had lower trueness. SBs were mostly positioned apically; however, the effect of SB replacement can be considered small as measured deviations were similar to those in previous studies and the precision of scans was high.
Repositioning of scan bodies into healing abutments would be expected to result in similar single crown positioning regardless of the location of the implant, considering high scan precision with the healing abutment-scan body system. The duration of the chairside adjustments of crowns in the posterior maxilla may be longer than those in the anterior region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104716</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37739057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Combined healing abutment-scan body ; Computer-Aided Design ; Dental Implants ; Dental Impression Technique ; Drug Repositioning ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Models, Dental ; Precision ; Repositioning ; Trueness</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2023-12, Vol.139, p.104716-104716, Article 104716</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-13b176bd1a401384d0675287321ba393e7568f082590178c033eee385526b4263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-13b176bd1a401384d0675287321ba393e7568f082590178c033eee385526b4263</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4570-9067 ; 0000-0002-3094-7487</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104716$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37739057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Mustafa Borga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güven, Mehmet Esad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou-Ayash, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çakmak, Gülce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Burak</creatorcontrib><title>Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>To evaluate the accuracy of the scans of the combined healing abutment-scan body (CHA-SB) system located at different sites of the maxilla when SBs are replaced in between each scan.
Three SBs were seated into HAs located at the central incisor, first premolar, and first molar sites of a maxillary model inside a phantom head, and the model was scanned extraorally (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2). This procedure was repeated with new SBs until a total of 10 scans were performed. Standard tessellation language files of CHA-SBs at each implant location were isolated, transferred into analysis software (Geomagic Control X), and superimposed over the proprietary library files to analyze surface (root mean square), linear, and angular deviations. Trueness and precision were evaluated with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests. The correlation between surface and angular deviations was analyzed with Pearson's correlation (α=0.05).
Molar implant scans had the highest surface and angular deviations (P≤.006), while central incisor implant scans had higher precision (surface deviations) than premolar implant scans (P=.041). Premolar implant scans had higher accuracy than central incisor implant scans on the y-axis (P≤.029). Central incisor implant scans had the highest accuracy on the z-axis (P≤.018). A strong positive correlation was observed between surface and angular deviations (r = 0.864, P<.001).
Central incisor implant scans mostly had high accuracy and molar implant scans mostly had lower trueness. SBs were mostly positioned apically; however, the effect of SB replacement can be considered small as measured deviations were similar to those in previous studies and the precision of scans was high.
Repositioning of scan bodies into healing abutments would be expected to result in similar single crown positioning regardless of the location of the implant, considering high scan precision with the healing abutment-scan body system. The duration of the chairside adjustments of crowns in the posterior maxilla may be longer than those in the anterior region.</description><subject>Combined healing abutment-scan body</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Impression Technique</subject><subject>Drug Repositioning</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Models, Dental</subject><subject>Precision</subject><subject>Repositioning</subject><subject>Trueness</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1q3DAURkVpaSZJn6BQtOzG0yvJtuRFFyWkPxDIJoXshCxdNxps2ZXkknmRPm81M2m7y0pwOff7dDmEvGWwZcDaD7vtzmHIWw5clEktWfuCbJiSXcVke_-SbEAAVI1k_Iycp7QDgBp495qcCSlFB43ckN93ccWAKVETHF0iWp_8HOg8UDtPvQ_o6AOa0Ycf1PRrnkojTdYE2s9uT9M-ZZyOg5KQqfPDgPHI-IzpEDOZRz-OhpohY6TTOma_jEgjLnNhStchunD5Af8HX5JXgxkTvnl6L8j3z9d3V1-rm9sv364-3VS2hjpXTPTl1N4xUwMTqnbQyoYrKTjrjegEyqZVAyjedMCksiAEIgrVNLzta96KC_L-lLvE-eeKKevJJ4vlvwHnNWmuWsV44UVBxQm1cU4p4qCX6CcT95qBPgjRO30Uog9C9ElI2Xr3VLD2E7p_O38NFODjCcBy5i-PUSfrMVh0vsjI2s3-2YI_K7ielQ</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Donmez, Mustafa Borga</creator><creator>Güven, Mehmet Esad</creator><creator>Yılmaz, Deniz</creator><creator>Abou-Ayash, Samir</creator><creator>Çakmak, Gülce</creator><creator>Yilmaz, Burak</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-9067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-7487</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body</title><author>Donmez, Mustafa Borga ; Güven, Mehmet Esad ; Yılmaz, Deniz ; Abou-Ayash, Samir ; Çakmak, Gülce ; Yilmaz, Burak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-13b176bd1a401384d0675287321ba393e7568f082590178c033eee385526b4263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Combined healing abutment-scan body</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Impression Technique</topic><topic>Drug Repositioning</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Models, Dental</topic><topic>Precision</topic><topic>Repositioning</topic><topic>Trueness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Mustafa Borga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güven, Mehmet Esad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou-Ayash, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çakmak, Gülce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Burak</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donmez, Mustafa Borga</au><au>Güven, Mehmet Esad</au><au>Yılmaz, Deniz</au><au>Abou-Ayash, Samir</au><au>Çakmak, Gülce</au><au>Yilmaz, Burak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>139</volume><spage>104716</spage><epage>104716</epage><pages>104716-104716</pages><artnum>104716</artnum><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the accuracy of the scans of the combined healing abutment-scan body (CHA-SB) system located at different sites of the maxilla when SBs are replaced in between each scan.
Three SBs were seated into HAs located at the central incisor, first premolar, and first molar sites of a maxillary model inside a phantom head, and the model was scanned extraorally (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2). This procedure was repeated with new SBs until a total of 10 scans were performed. Standard tessellation language files of CHA-SBs at each implant location were isolated, transferred into analysis software (Geomagic Control X), and superimposed over the proprietary library files to analyze surface (root mean square), linear, and angular deviations. Trueness and precision were evaluated with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests. The correlation between surface and angular deviations was analyzed with Pearson's correlation (α=0.05).
Molar implant scans had the highest surface and angular deviations (P≤.006), while central incisor implant scans had higher precision (surface deviations) than premolar implant scans (P=.041). Premolar implant scans had higher accuracy than central incisor implant scans on the y-axis (P≤.029). Central incisor implant scans had the highest accuracy on the z-axis (P≤.018). A strong positive correlation was observed between surface and angular deviations (r = 0.864, P<.001).
Central incisor implant scans mostly had high accuracy and molar implant scans mostly had lower trueness. SBs were mostly positioned apically; however, the effect of SB replacement can be considered small as measured deviations were similar to those in previous studies and the precision of scans was high.
Repositioning of scan bodies into healing abutments would be expected to result in similar single crown positioning regardless of the location of the implant, considering high scan precision with the healing abutment-scan body system. The duration of the chairside adjustments of crowns in the posterior maxilla may be longer than those in the anterior region.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37739057</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104716</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-9067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-7487</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0300-5712 |
| ispartof | Journal of dentistry, 2023-12, Vol.139, p.104716-104716, Article 104716 |
| issn | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2868128553 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Combined healing abutment-scan body Computer-Aided Design Dental Implants Dental Impression Technique Drug Repositioning Imaging, Three-Dimensional Maxilla - diagnostic imaging Models, Dental Precision Repositioning Trueness |
| title | Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A15%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trueness%20and%20precision%20of%20combined%20healing%20abutment%20scan%20body%20system%20scans%20at%20different%20sites%20of%20maxilla%20after%20multiple%20repositioning%20of%20the%20scan%20body&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Donmez,%20Mustafa%20Borga&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=139&rft.spage=104716&rft.epage=104716&rft.pages=104716-104716&rft.artnum=104716&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104716&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2868128553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2868128553&rft_id=info:pmid/37739057&rft_els_id=S0300571223003020&rfr_iscdi=true |