Physical characteristics of deep learning-based image processing software in computed tomography: a phantom study
Purpose This study aimed to assess the image characteristics of deep-learning-based image processing software (DLIP; FCT PixelShine, FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan) and compare it with filtered back projection (FBP), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine 2023-12, Vol.46 (4), p.1713-1721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
This study aimed to assess the image characteristics of deep-learning-based image processing software (DLIP; FCT PixelShine, FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan) and compare it with filtered back projection (FBP), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR).
Methods
This phantom study assessed the object-specific spatial resolution (task-based transfer function [TTF]), noise characteristics (noise power spectrum [NPS]), and low-contrast detectability (low-contrast object-specific contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR
LO
]) at three different output doses (standard: 10 mGy; low: 3.9 mGy; ultralow: 2.0 mGy). The processing strength of DLIP
FBP
with A1, A4, and A9 was compared with those of FBP, MBIR, and DLR.
Result
The standard dose with high-contrast TTFs of DLIP
FBP
exceeded that of FBP. Low-contrast TTFs were comparable to or lower than that of FBP. The NPS peak frequency (
f
P
) of DLIP
FBP
shifts to low spatial frequencies of up to 8.6% at ultralow doses compared to the standard FBP dose. MBIR shifted the most
f
P
compared to FBP—a marked shift of up to 49%. DLIP
FBP
showed a CNR
LO
equal to or greater than that of DLR in standard or low doses. In contrast, the CNR
LO
of the DLIP
FBP
was equal to or lower than that of the DLR in ultralow doses.
Conclusion
DLIP
FBP
reduced image noise while maintaining a resolution similar to commercially available MBIR and DLR. The slight spatial frequency shift of
f
P
in DLIP
FBP
contributed to the noise texture degradation suppression. The NPS suppression in the low spatial frequency range effectively improved the low-contrast detectability. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2662-4729 0158-9938 2662-4737 1879-5447 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13246-023-01331-7 |