What eyes do not see the heart does not grieve over? The role of intracoronary imaging in acute myocardial infarction: a case report

BackgroundThe evaluation of a three-dimensional structure with a two-dimensional imaging technique makes intracoronary diagnostic techniques essential, especially in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when no apparent coronary lesions are detected. Expert consensus recommend their use in certain scenarios such as angiographically ambiguous disease and identification of the culprit lesion. Although both intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography (OCT) allow the characterization of the atherosclerotic plaque and assess the immediate and long-term results of stent implantation, they have their own benefits and limitations that make them ideal for different types of coronary lesions. Case summaryWe present the case of a lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction with no evident coronary lesions in angiography, in which OCT not only allowed us to confirm a diagonal branch occlusion, but it also became crucial to locate the occlusion point and to guide the procedure, allowing complete revascularization of the culprit lesion that otherwise could have been missed. DiscussionTo know the actual limitations of conventional coronary angiography to adequately assess coronary disease, intracoronary diagnostic techniques are key to evaluate the underlying mechanisms of the event, especially in the setting of AMI when no clear culprit lesion has been identified. They can be of great value to locate and revascularize acute occlusions that could go unnoticed on the angiogram, guiding the revascularization and stent implantation and, therefore, preventing myocardial injury that could become irreversible when coronary disease is not treated promptly.