Inoculum cell count influences separation efficiency and variance in Ames plate incorporation and Ames RAMOS test

The Ames test is one of the most applied tools in mutagenicity testing of chemicals ever since its introduction by Ames et al. in the 1970s. Its principle is based on histidine auxotrophic bacteria that regain prototrophy through reverse mutations. In the presence of a mutagen, more reverse mutations occur that become visible as increased bacterial growth on medium without histidine. Many miniaturized formats of the Ames test have emerged to enable the testing of environmental water samples, increase experimental throughput, and lower the required amounts of test substances. However, most of these formats still rely on endpoint determinations. In contrast, the recently introduced Ames RAMOS test determines mutagenicity through online monitoring of the oxygen transfer rate. In this study, the oxygen transfer rate of Salmonella typhimurium TA100 during the Ames plate incorporation test was monitored and compared to the Ames RAMOS test to prove its validity further. Furthermore, the Ames RAMOS test in 96-well scale is newly introduced. For both the Ames plate incorporation and the Ames RAMOS test, the influence of the inoculum cell count on the negative control was highlighted: A lower inoculum cell count led to a higher coefficient of variation. However, a lower inoculum cell count also led to a higher separation efficiency in the Ames RAMOS test and, thus, to better detection of a mutagenic substance at lower concentrations. [Display omitted] •Area-specific oxygen transfer rate monitored during Ames plate incorporation test•Oxygen transfer rates comparable to the Ames RAMOS test•Ames RAMOS test progressed identically in flask, 48-well and 96-well MTP scale.•Higher inoculum cell count led to a lower coefficient of variance in both tests.