Interim Analysis of Clinical Outcomes with Open Versus Closed Conjunctiva Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent

/Purpose: To examine the longitudinal postoperative outcomes of open versus closed conjunctiva implantation of the XEN45 gel stent.OBJECTIVE/Purpose: To examine the longitudinal postoperative outcomes of open versus closed conjunctiva implantation of the XEN45 gel stent.Retrospective multicenter stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2023-09
Hauptverfasser: McGlumphy, Elyse J, Do, Anna, Du, Amy, Craven, Earl Randy, Geyman, Lawrence S, Shen, Leo, Schuman, Joel S, Panarelli, Joseph F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:/Purpose: To examine the longitudinal postoperative outcomes of open versus closed conjunctiva implantation of the XEN45 gel stent.OBJECTIVE/Purpose: To examine the longitudinal postoperative outcomes of open versus closed conjunctiva implantation of the XEN45 gel stent.Retrospective multicenter study.DESIGNRetrospective multicenter study.193 patients with glaucoma underwent XEN45 implantation via an open or closed conjunctiva approach.SUBJECTS193 patients with glaucoma underwent XEN45 implantation via an open or closed conjunctiva approach.Patient demographics, diagnoses, preoperative and postoperative clinical data, outcome measures including intraocular pressure (IOP), use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity, and complications were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as significant.METHODSPatient demographics, diagnoses, preoperative and postoperative clinical data, outcome measures including intraocular pressure (IOP), use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity, and complications were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as significant.Failure was defined as less than 20% reduction of IOP from medicated baseline or IOP > 21 mmHg at 2 consecutive visits at postoperative month 1 and beyond, the need for subsequent operative intervention or additional glaucoma surgery, or a catastrophic event such as loss of light perception. Eyes that had not failed by these criteria and were not on glaucoma medications were considered complete successes. Overall success was defined as those who achieved success either with or without topical medications.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESFailure was defined as less than 20% reduction of IOP from medicated baseline or IOP > 21 mmHg at 2 consecutive visits at postoperative month 1 and beyond, the need for subsequent operative intervention or additional glaucoma surgery, or a catastrophic event such as loss of light perception. Eyes that had not failed by these criteria and were not on glaucoma medications were considered complete successes. Overall success was defined as those who achieved success either with or without topical medications.Patients were followed for an average of 17 months. Complete success was achieved in 42.5% and 24.7% of the open and closed groups, respectively (P = 0.01). Overall success was achieved in 64.2% and 37.0% of the open and closed groups, respectively (P < 0.001) at the last follow up. Bleb needling was performed in 12.4% of eyes in the open group comp
ISSN:2589-4196
2589-4196
DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2023.09.001