Extramedullary haematopoiesis in patients with thalassemia: a cross-sectional description of its prevalence, clinical features and survival

INTRODUCTIONDespite knowledge advances on extramedullary haematopoiesis (EMH) in thalassemic patients, the real picture remains an open issue. OBJECTIVESTo assess EMH prevalence in patients with thalassemia major (TM) and intermedia (TI), to describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy Transfusion and Cell Therapy, 2023-08
Hauptverfasser: Chapchap, Eduardo Cerello, Silva, Murilo Marques Almeida, Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb, Araujo, Aderson da Silva, de Assis, Reijane Alves, Loggetto, Sandra Regina, Junior, Antonio Fabron, Verissimo, Monica Pinheiro de Almeida, Baldanzi, Giorgio Roberto, Fertrin, Kleber Yotsumoto, Tricta, Fernando, Piga, Antonio Giulio, Hamerschlak, Nelson
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:INTRODUCTIONDespite knowledge advances on extramedullary haematopoiesis (EMH) in thalassemic patients, the real picture remains an open issue. OBJECTIVESTo assess EMH prevalence in patients with thalassemia major (TM) and intermedia (TI), to describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and to explore clinical risk factors. METHODSIn this cross-sectional study, images and clinical records of 184 consecutive patients with thalassemia who underwent T2* MRI between 2004 and 2011 were reviewed. Association of EMH with survival was investigated for patients with available follow-up charts. RESULTSEMH was detected in 16/168 (9.5%) patients with TM (aged 19-49 years) and in 3/16 (18.8%) with TI (aged 36-41 years). Most (88%) had paravertebral thoracic and/or abdominal masses. Age was significantly associated with EMH risk (hazard ratio, [HR] 1.10/year; confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.18; p-value < 0.001), while lower pancreatic iron content by T2*MRI (HR: 0.94/ms; CI: 0.89-0.99; p-value = 0.049) was a protective factor. Estimated survival rate was superior for EMH-positive (n = 19) when compared to EMH-negative patients (n = 75) (p-value = 0.013). CONCLUSIONSThe prevalence of EMH was 10.3% (19/184), presented mainly as tumoral masses of 3 to 10 cm. Age was a risk factor for EMH development, while lower pancreatic iron might be a protective factor in this cohort.
ISSN:2531-1379
2531-1387
DOI:10.1016/j.htct.2023.07.005