Washed microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile infection: A national multicenter real‐world study

ObjectivesFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recommended for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of washed microbiota transplantation (WMT), a new method of FMT, for CDI across various medical sett...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of digestive diseases 2023-10, Vol.24 (10), p.540-549
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Xia, Ai, Ru Jun, Xu, Jie, Wen, Quan, Pan, Hua Qin, Zhang, Zhi Hua, Ning, Wang, Fang, Ying, Ding, Da Fa, Wang, Quan, Han, Shuang, Liu, Xiao, Wu, Mei, Jia, Zhen Yu, Jia, Song, Lin, Tao, Cui, Bo Ta, Nie, Yong Zhan, Wang, Xin, Zhang, Fa Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recommended for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of washed microbiota transplantation (WMT), a new method of FMT, for CDI across various medical settings.MethodsThis multicenter real‐world cohort study included CDI patients undergoing WMT. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate of CDI within 8 weeks after WMT. Secondary outcomes included the CDI recurrence rate and reduction in total abdominal symptom score (TASS) during the follow‐up period. Adverse events related to WMT were recorded.ResultsAltogether 90.7% (49/54) of CDI patients achieved clinical cure after treated with WMT. The cure rate was 83.3% for cases with severe and complicated CDI (ScCDI) (n = 30) and 100% for non‐ScCDI cases (n = 24) (P = 0.059). No difference was observed in the clinical cure rate between patients with first and recurrent CDI (91.9% vs 88.2%, P = 0.645). One week post‐WMT, TASS showed a remarkable decrease compared to that at baseline (P 
ISSN:1751-2972
1751-2980
DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.13227