Phase angle is associated with sarcopenic obesity in post-stroke patients

Evidence is limited concerning the association between bioimpedance analysis-derived phase angle and sarcopenic obesity. This study examined this association in patients who underwent convalescent rehabilitation after stroke. This cross-sectional study included hospitalized patients with post-acute...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2023-10, Vol.42 (10), p.2051-2057
Hauptverfasser: Yoshimura, Yoshihiro, Wakabayashi, Hidetaka, Nagano, Fumihiko, Matsumoto, Ayaka, Shimazu, Sayuri, Shiraishi, Ai, Kido, Yoshifumi, Bise, Takahiro, Hori, Kota, Yoneda, Koki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Evidence is limited concerning the association between bioimpedance analysis-derived phase angle and sarcopenic obesity. This study examined this association in patients who underwent convalescent rehabilitation after stroke. This cross-sectional study included hospitalized patients with post-acute stroke. The phase angle was measured using a multifrequency bioimpedance analysis. Sarcopenic obesity was diagnosed according to the European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism/European Association for the Study of Obesity criteria. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between the phase angle and sarcopenic obesity after adjusting for confounding factors. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the optimal phase angle cutoff value for predicting sarcopenic obesity. A total of 760 patients (median age 71 years; 352 women) were analyzed. The median (interquartile range, 25th and 75th percentiles) phase angle was 4.45° (4.10°, 4.88°). Sarcopenic obesity was diagnosed in 16 (3.9%) men, 18 (5.1%) women, and 34 (4.5%) patients overall. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that sarcopenic obesity (β = −0.185, p = 0.017) and sarcopenia (β = −0.121, p = 0.012) were significantly and negatively associated with the phase angle. Obesity was not significantly associated with the phase angle (β = −0.078, p = 0.094). The optimal cutoff value of the phase angle for diagnosing sarcopenic obesity was 4.29° (sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.80, area under the curve [AUC] 0.79, 95% CI 0.77–0.87, p 
ISSN:0261-5614
1532-1983
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.08.018