The Bicêtre occlusion scale is well suited to assess the efficacy of the Contour embolization device

The Contour Embolization Device (CED) is typically assessed using coiling angiographic outcomes. However, these scales do not address device-specific problematics. We evaluated the usability of the Bicêtre occlusion scale (BOS) with the CED. BOS scores can be analyzed as BOSS 0 = no residual flow, B...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroradiology 2024-03, Vol.51 (2), p.220-223
Hauptverfasser: Caroff, Jildaz, Cortese, Jonathan, D'Argento, Francesco, Popica, Dan Adrian, Mihalea, Cristian, Spelle, Laurent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Contour Embolization Device (CED) is typically assessed using coiling angiographic outcomes. However, these scales do not address device-specific problematics. We evaluated the usability of the Bicêtre occlusion scale (BOS) with the CED. BOS scores can be analyzed as BOSS 0 = no residual flow, BOSS 1 = residual flow inside the CED but with complete neck-sealing, BOSS 2 = neck-remnant, BOSS 3 = aneurysm-remnant, BOSS 1 + 3 = contrast filling inside the device and aneurysmal sac without complete neck-sealing. BOS usage should be encouraged as it provides a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanism of CED occlusion, especially considering the potential prognostic value of the neck sealing assessment.
ISSN:0150-9861
DOI:10.1016/j.neurad.2023.08.006