Ready or not, here EPAs come
With the recent implementation of general surgery residency workplace-based assessments in the form of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), understanding the reliability of competency-based assessment tools is critical. In this issue of American Journal of Surgery, Toale et al. examined the r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2023-11, Vol.226 (5), p.586-587 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 587 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 586 |
| container_title | The American journal of surgery |
| container_volume | 226 |
| creator | Weaver, M. Libby |
| description | With the recent implementation of general surgery residency workplace-based assessments in the form of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), understanding the reliability of competency-based assessment tools is critical. In this issue of American Journal of Surgery, Toale et al. examined the reliability of workplace-based assessments in determining operative competence using an analogous assessment tool in Ireland, the Supervised Structured Assessment of Operative Performance (SSAOP).1 They found reliable assessment of operative performance for surgical trainees is enhanced when repeated micro-assessments of commonly performed procedures are collected from multiple faculty. Program Directors, on the other hand, convey a relative neutrality regarding the impact of EPA assessments on improving training or confidence of graduating surgical trainees, questioning whether they are robust enough to be relevant and meaningful.6 This highlights the importance of confirming reliability of the tool as it is broadly implemented on a national scale. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2858989804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2858989804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-1be8cb74f911b13b4d1e131a201ed7ebc4185eff4baacf65ef226daeab55bbab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_QGHBiwd3nUmyu9ljKfUDCoroOSTZWe3SbWrSPfTfG2lPMoeZgYeXl4exG4QCAauHvjBDH8fwVXDgogBVAMIJm6CqmxyVEqdsAgA8byqEc3YRY59eRCkm7PqdTLvPfMg2fneffVOgbPE2i5nzA12ys86sI10d95R9Pi4-5s_58vXpZT5b5k6g3OVoSTlby65BtCisbJFQoOGA1NZknURVUtdJa4zrqnRyXrWGjC1La40VU3Z3yN0G_zNS3OlhFR2t12ZDfoyaq1I1aUAm9PYf2vsxbFK7RCmsZc0FJKo8UC74GAN1ehtWgwl7jaD_nOleH53pP2calE7OxC-Sx2Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2881747230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ready or not, here EPAs come</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Weaver, M. Libby</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, M. Libby</creatorcontrib><description>With the recent implementation of general surgery residency workplace-based assessments in the form of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), understanding the reliability of competency-based assessment tools is critical. In this issue of American Journal of Surgery, Toale et al. examined the reliability of workplace-based assessments in determining operative competence using an analogous assessment tool in Ireland, the Supervised Structured Assessment of Operative Performance (SSAOP).1 They found reliable assessment of operative performance for surgical trainees is enhanced when repeated micro-assessments of commonly performed procedures are collected from multiple faculty. Program Directors, on the other hand, convey a relative neutrality regarding the impact of EPA assessments on improving training or confidence of graduating surgical trainees, questioning whether they are robust enough to be relevant and meaningful.6 This highlights the importance of confirming reliability of the tool as it is broadly implemented on a national scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Environmental assessment ; Medical education ; Reliability analysis ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2023-11, Vol.226 (5), p.586-587</ispartof><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-1be8cb74f911b13b4d1e131a201ed7ebc4185eff4baacf65ef226daeab55bbab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-1be8cb74f911b13b4d1e131a201ed7ebc4185eff4baacf65ef226daeab55bbab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8947-4613</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2881747230?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, M. Libby</creatorcontrib><title>Ready or not, here EPAs come</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><description>With the recent implementation of general surgery residency workplace-based assessments in the form of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), understanding the reliability of competency-based assessment tools is critical. In this issue of American Journal of Surgery, Toale et al. examined the reliability of workplace-based assessments in determining operative competence using an analogous assessment tool in Ireland, the Supervised Structured Assessment of Operative Performance (SSAOP).1 They found reliable assessment of operative performance for surgical trainees is enhanced when repeated micro-assessments of commonly performed procedures are collected from multiple faculty. Program Directors, on the other hand, convey a relative neutrality regarding the impact of EPA assessments on improving training or confidence of graduating surgical trainees, questioning whether they are robust enough to be relevant and meaningful.6 This highlights the importance of confirming reliability of the tool as it is broadly implemented on a national scale.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_QGHBiwd3nUmyu9ljKfUDCoroOSTZWe3SbWrSPfTfG2lPMoeZgYeXl4exG4QCAauHvjBDH8fwVXDgogBVAMIJm6CqmxyVEqdsAgA8byqEc3YRY59eRCkm7PqdTLvPfMg2fneffVOgbPE2i5nzA12ys86sI10d95R9Pi4-5s_58vXpZT5b5k6g3OVoSTlby65BtCisbJFQoOGA1NZknURVUtdJa4zrqnRyXrWGjC1La40VU3Z3yN0G_zNS3OlhFR2t12ZDfoyaq1I1aUAm9PYf2vsxbFK7RCmsZc0FJKo8UC74GAN1ehtWgwl7jaD_nOleH53pP2calE7OxC-Sx2Aw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Weaver, M. Libby</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8947-4613</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Ready or not, here EPAs come</title><author>Weaver, M. Libby</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-1be8cb74f911b13b4d1e131a201ed7ebc4185eff4baacf65ef226daeab55bbab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, M. Libby</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, M. Libby</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ready or not, here EPAs come</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>226</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>587</epage><pages>586-587</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>With the recent implementation of general surgery residency workplace-based assessments in the form of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), understanding the reliability of competency-based assessment tools is critical. In this issue of American Journal of Surgery, Toale et al. examined the reliability of workplace-based assessments in determining operative competence using an analogous assessment tool in Ireland, the Supervised Structured Assessment of Operative Performance (SSAOP).1 They found reliable assessment of operative performance for surgical trainees is enhanced when repeated micro-assessments of commonly performed procedures are collected from multiple faculty. Program Directors, on the other hand, convey a relative neutrality regarding the impact of EPA assessments on improving training or confidence of graduating surgical trainees, questioning whether they are robust enough to be relevant and meaningful.6 This highlights the importance of confirming reliability of the tool as it is broadly implemented on a national scale.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.010</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8947-4613</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
| ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2023-11, Vol.226 (5), p.586-587 |
| issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2858989804 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Assessments Environmental assessment Medical education Reliability analysis Surgery |
| title | Ready or not, here EPAs come |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A19%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ready%20or%20not,%20here%20EPAs%20come&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Weaver,%20M.%20Libby&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=226&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=587&rft.pages=586-587&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2858989804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2881747230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |