Evaluation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the rectal cancers: comparison between modified reduced field-of-view single-shot echo-planar imaging with tilted two-dimensional radiofrequency excitation pulses and conventional full field-of-view readout-segmented echo-planar imaging

Purpose To evaluate the image quality qualitatively and quantitatively, as well as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of modified reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using spatially tailored two-dimensional radiofrequency pulses with tilted excitation p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiologia medica 2023-10, Vol.128 (10), p.1192-1198
Hauptverfasser: Inoue, Atsuo, Tanabe, Masahiro, Ihara, Kenichiro, Hideura, Keiko, Higashi, Mayumi, Benkert, Thomas, Imai, Hiroshi, Yamane, Masatoshi, Yamaguchi, Takahiro, Ueda, Takaaki, Ito, Katsuyoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the image quality qualitatively and quantitatively, as well as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of modified reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using spatially tailored two-dimensional radiofrequency pulses with tilted excitation plane (tilted r-DWI) based on single-shot echo planar imaging (SS-EPI) compared with full-size field-of-view DWI (f-DWI) using readout segmented (RS)-EPI in patients with rectal cancer. Materials and methods Twenty-two patients who underwent an MRI for further evaluation of rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. All MR images were analyzed to compare image quality, lesion conspicuity, and artifacts between f-DWI with RS-EPI and tilted r-DWI with SS-EPI. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and ADC values were also compared. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t test was performed to compare the qualitative and quantitative assessments. Results All image quality scores, except aliasing artifacts, were significantly higher ( p  
ISSN:1826-6983
0033-8362
1826-6983
DOI:10.1007/s11547-023-01699-2