Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Risk of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome

Abstract Context Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plays a key role in diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome (MetS). An increasing number of studies have reported the association between mtDNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and the risk of diabetes mellitus and MetS; however, the associations remain conflicted a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2023-12, Vol.109 (1), p.e406-e417
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Cuihong, Chen, Lifang, Li, Jiangtao, Ma, Juanjuan, Luo, Jun, Lv, Qian, Xiao, Jian, Gao, Pan, Chai, Wen, Li, Xu, Zhang, Ming, Hu, Fulan, Hu, Dongsheng, Qin, Pei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Context Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plays a key role in diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome (MetS). An increasing number of studies have reported the association between mtDNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and the risk of diabetes mellitus and MetS; however, the associations remain conflicted and a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between mtDNA-CN and diabetes mellitus and MetS is lacking. Objective We aimed to investigate the association of mtDNA-CN and diabetes mellitus and MetS using a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched up to December 15, 2022. Random-effect models were used to summarize the relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs. Results A total of 19 articles were included in the systematic review and 6 articles (12 studies) in the meta-analysis involving 21 714 patients with diabetes (318 870 participants) and 5031 MetS (15 040 participants). Compared to the highest mtDNA-CN, the summary RR (95% CIs) for the lowest mtDNA-CN were 1.06 (95% CI, 1.01-1.12; I2 = 79.4%; n = 8) for diabetes (prospective study: 1.11 (1.02-1.21); I2 = 22.6%; n = 4; case-control: 1.27 (0.66-2.43); I2 = 81.8%; n = 2; cross-sectional: 1.01 (0.99-1.03); I2 = 74.7%; n = 2), and 1.03 (0.99-1.07; I2 = 70.6%; n = 4) for MetS (prospective: 2.87 (1.51-5.48); I2 = 0; n = 2; cross-sectional: 1.02 (1.01-1.04); I2 = 0; n = 2). Conclusion Decreased mtDNA-CN was associated with increased risk of diabetes mellitus and MetS when limited to prospective studies. More longitudinal studies are warranted.
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgad403