Improvement in electrocardiographic parameters of repolarization related to sudden death in patients with ventricular dysfunction and left bundle branch block after cardiac resynchronization through His bundle pacing

Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) through permanent His bundle pacing (p-HBP) normalizes interventricular conduction disorders and QRS . Similarly, there are immediate and long-term changes in repolarization, which could be prognostic of a lower risk of sudden death (SD) at follow-u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2023-12, Vol.66 (9), p.2003-2010
Hauptverfasser: Moriña-Vázquez, Pablo, Moraleda-Salas, María Teresa, López-Masjuan-Ríos, Álvaro, Esteve-Ruiz, Irene, Arce-León, Álvaro, Lluch-Requerey, Carmen, Rodríguez-Albarrán, Adrián, Venegas-Gamero, José, Gómez-Menchero, Antonio Enrique
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) through permanent His bundle pacing (p-HBP) normalizes interventricular conduction disorders and QRS . Similarly, there are immediate and long-term changes in repolarization, which could be prognostic of a lower risk of sudden death (SD) at follow-up. We aimed to compare the changes in different electrocardiographic (ECG) repolarization parameters related to the risk of SD before and after CRT through p-HBP. Methods In this prospective, descriptive single-center study (May 2019 to December 2021), we compared the ECG parameters of repolarization related to SD in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and CRT indications, at baseline and after CRT through p-HBP. Results Forty-three patients were included. Compared to baseline, after CRT through p-HBP, there were immediate significant changes in the QT interval (ms): 445 [407.5–480] vs 410 [385–440] ( p  = 0.006), QT dispersion (ms): 80 [60–100] vs 40 [40–65] ( p  
ISSN:1572-8595
1383-875X
1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-023-01526-8