Evaluation of stable chest pain following emergency department presentation: Impact of first‐line cardiac computed tomography diagnostic strategy in an Australian setting

Objective International guidelines provide increasing support for computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in investigating chest pain. A pathway utilising CTCA first‐line for outpatient stable chest pain evaluation was implemented in an Australian ED. Methods In pre‐post design, the impact o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emergency medicine Australasia 2024-02, Vol.36 (1), p.31-38
Hauptverfasser: Lan, Nick S.R., Thomas, David‐Raj, Jones, Christopher L, Raju, Vikram, Soon, Jeanette, Otto, Jacobus, Wood, Chris, Briffa, Tom, Dwivedi, Girish, Rankin, James M, Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective International guidelines provide increasing support for computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in investigating chest pain. A pathway utilising CTCA first‐line for outpatient stable chest pain evaluation was implemented in an Australian ED. Methods In pre‐post design, the impact of the pathway was prospectively assessed over 6 months (August 2021 to January 2022) and compared with a 6‐month pre‐implementation group (February 2021 to July 2021). CTCA was recommended first‐line in suspected stable cardiac chest pain, followed by chest pain clinic review. Predefined criteria were provided recommending functional testing in select patients. The impact of CTCA versus functional testing was evaluated. Data were obtained from digital medical records. Results Three hundred and fifteen patients were included, 143 pre‐implementation and 172 post‐implementation. Characteristics were similar except age (pre‐implementation: 58.9 ± 12.0 vs post‐implementation: 62.8 ± 12.3 years, P = 0.004). Pathway‐guided management resulted in higher first‐line CTCA (73.3% vs 46.2%, P 
ISSN:1742-6731
1742-6723
DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14290