Modelled and observed plastic pollution on remote Scottish beaches: The importance of local marine sources
Beach-cleans conducted on the west coast of Scotland investigated the distribution of land- and marine-sourced litter and compared these with a particle tracking model representing the presumed principal land-based source. Modelled particles dispersed widely, even reaching the remote northwest coast...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine pollution bulletin 2023-09, Vol.194, p.115341-115341, Article 115341 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Beach-cleans conducted on the west coast of Scotland investigated the distribution of land- and marine-sourced litter and compared these with a particle tracking model representing the presumed principal land-based source. Modelled particles dispersed widely, even reaching the remote northwest coast, with ‘hotspots’ and ‘coldspots’ on windward and leeward coasts respectively. In beach sampling, however, land-sourced litter represented only 19% of items by count and 8% by weight, while marine-sourced litter represented 46% by count and 62% by weight. The source of the remainder could not be identified. Windward coasts had an average count of 1859 litter items per 100 m, and weight of 14,862 g per 100 m. Leeward coasts had an average count of 32 litter items per 100 m and weight of 738 g per 100 m. Field observations and model predictions were consistent in many respects for land-sourced litter, however marine-sourced litter is dominant on many coastlines.
•Field observations of beached plastic litter coincide with predictions from a particle tracking model.•Land-sourced litter (e.g., crisp packets, drinks bottles and caps) dominated in industrialised and more populated areas.•Marine-sourced litter (e.g., fishing nets and fishing ropes) dominated on remote and less-populated coastlines.•Land-sourced litter represented 8 % by weight, marine-sourced litter 62 % and litter of unknown source 30 %.•Windward coastal sites had a higher level of beached litter than leeward coastal sites. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0025-326X 1879-3363 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115341 |