Assessment of the change of antiemetic prophylaxis from double to triple combination in patients with high dose carboplatin chemotherapy

Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the adverse events that most affects oncologic patients’ quality of life. Carboplatin AUC ≥ 4 belongs to agents with high emetic risk (moderate risk in ASCO guidelines). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of netupitant/palonos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2024-10, Vol.30 (6), p.999-1009
Hauptverfasser: Albanell-Fernández, Marta, Pérez Sánchez, Ángela, Monge-Escartín, Inés, Riu-Viladoms, Gisela, Rodríguez Mues, Mª Carmen, Corominas Bosch, Mª Lourdes, Gaba García, Lydia, Rollán, Neus Basté, Reguart, Noemí, Soy Muner, Dolors, Carcelero San Martín, Esther
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the adverse events that most affects oncologic patients’ quality of life. Carboplatin AUC ≥ 4 belongs to agents with high emetic risk (moderate risk in ASCO guidelines). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of netupitant/palonosetron and dexamethasone triple combination (TC) therapy versus ondansetron and dexamethasone double combination (DC) therapy as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with carboplatin AUC ≥ 4. As a secondary endpoint, in TC group we evaluated the effectiveness of changing NEPA administration timing from 1 h to 15 min before chemotherapy. Methods Open-label prospective study conducted in a tertiary-care hospital in patients receiving carboplatin AUC ≥ 4. CINV was evaluated using MASCC antiemetic tool, in acute (
ISSN:1078-1552
1477-092X
1477-092X
DOI:10.1177/10781552231194077