Assessment of the change of antiemetic prophylaxis from double to triple combination in patients with high dose carboplatin chemotherapy
Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the adverse events that most affects oncologic patients’ quality of life. Carboplatin AUC ≥ 4 belongs to agents with high emetic risk (moderate risk in ASCO guidelines). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of netupitant/palonos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2024-10, Vol.30 (6), p.999-1009 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the adverse events that most affects oncologic patients’ quality of life. Carboplatin AUC ≥ 4 belongs to agents with high emetic risk (moderate risk in ASCO guidelines). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of netupitant/palonosetron and dexamethasone triple combination (TC) therapy versus ondansetron and dexamethasone double combination (DC) therapy as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with carboplatin AUC ≥ 4. As a secondary endpoint, in TC group we evaluated the effectiveness of changing NEPA administration timing from 1 h to 15 min before chemotherapy.
Methods
Open-label prospective study conducted in a tertiary-care hospital in patients receiving carboplatin AUC ≥ 4. CINV was evaluated using MASCC antiemetic tool, in acute ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-1552 1477-092X 1477-092X |
DOI: | 10.1177/10781552231194077 |