Vascular‐ and nerve‐sparing bowel resection for deep endometriosis: A retrospective single‐center study

Objective Surgical management of bowel endometriosis is still controversial. Recently, many authors have pointed out the potential benefits of preserving the superior rectal artery, thus ensuring better perfusion of the anastomosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complication rate and fun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2024-01, Vol.164 (1), p.277-285
Hauptverfasser: Ianieri, Manuel Maria, De Cicco Nardone, Alessandra, Benvenga, Greta, Greco, Pierfrancesco, Pafundi, Pia Clara, Alesi, Maria Vittoria, Campolo, Federica, Lodoli, Claudio, Abatini, Carlo, Attalla El Halabieh, Miriam, Pacelli, Fabio, Scambia, Giovanni, Santullo, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Surgical management of bowel endometriosis is still controversial. Recently, many authors have pointed out the potential benefits of preserving the superior rectal artery, thus ensuring better perfusion of the anastomosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complication rate and functional outcomes of a bowel resection technique for deep endometriosis (DE) involving a nerve‐ and vascular‐sparing approach. Methods A single‐center retrospective study was conducted by enrolling patients who underwent segmental resection of the rectus sigmoid for DE in our department between September 2019 and April 2022. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded for each woman, and functional outcomes relating to the pelvic organs were assessed using validated questionnaires (Knowles‐Eccersley‐Scott‐Symptom [KESS] questionnaire and Gastro‐Intestinal Quality of Life Index [GIQLI] for bowel function, Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [BFLUTS] for urinary function, and Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI] for sexual function). These were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively after 6 months from surgery. Results Sixty‐one patients were enrolled. No patients had Clavien‐Dindo grade 3 or 4 complications, there were no rectovaginal fistulas or ureteral lesions, and in no cases was it necessary to reoperate. Temporary bladder voiding deficits were reported in 8.2% of patients, which were treated with self‐catheterizations, always resolving within 45 days of surgery. Gastrointestinal function evaluated by KESS and GIQLI improved significantly after surgery, whereas sexual function appeared to worsen, although without reaching the level of statistically significant validity. Conclusion Our vascular‐ and nerve‐sparing segmental bowel resection technique for DE had a low intraoperative and postoperative complication rate and produced an improvement in gastrointestinal function after surgery. Synopsis Our vascular‐ and nerve‐sparing technique for bowel resection for endometriosis is associated with an improvement of gastrointestinal function and a low rate of postoperative complications.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15019