The injectivity of coalbed CO(sub 2) injection wells
Though it may be possible to enhance methane production from coal by injecting CO(sub 2), because coal is poorly permeable it is usually necessary to inject under fracturing conditions to achieve acceptable injectivity. Concomitantly, the process of replacing methane by the injected CO(sub 2) causes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2004-08, Vol.13 |t 41, p.1423-1429. |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Though it may be possible to enhance methane production from coal by injecting CO(sub 2), because coal is poorly permeable it is usually necessary to inject under fracturing conditions to achieve acceptable injectivity. Concomitantly, the process of replacing methane by the injected CO(sub 2) causes the matrix to swell. These two processes - the fracturing of the coal and the swelling - have opposite effect on the injectivity. TNO-NITG have pressure data from a CO(sub 2) injection test in a coalbed methane field. We used the SIMED II coalbed methane simulator to history match the test behaviour and to find the most sensitive parameters affecting the injectivity of the CO(sub 2) injection well. An analysis of the pressure records revealed both the occurrence of fracturing and the reduction in permeability that swelling induced. When applied to an extended injection simulation, the simulator showed that the most sensitive parameters influencing the injectivity were the permeability, the fracture conductivity, and the cleat system porosity. Unfortunately, due to the adsorption of the CO(sub 2) and the fluctuations in pressure during injection tests, all these vary over time. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-5442 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.076 |