The partial Talbot effect and its use in measuring the coherence of synchrotron X-rays
The Talbot effect is the self‐imaging, at distances D multiple of DR, of the intensity downstream of a periodic object. Earlier work with hard synchrotron radiation X‐rays showed the variation with D of the fundamental Fourier component of intensity to be a good measurement of beam coherence. Any hi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of synchrotron radiation 2004-11, Vol.11 (6), p.476-482 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Talbot effect is the self‐imaging, at distances D multiple of DR, of the intensity downstream of a periodic object. Earlier work with hard synchrotron radiation X‐rays showed the variation with D of the fundamental Fourier component of intensity to be a good measurement of beam coherence. Any higher‐order Fourier coefficients (D, m > 1) would be periodic with a reduced period DRm = DR/m for an ideally coherent incident beam (partial Talbot effect). The degree of coherence γ(x) is sampled through the ratio of (D, m) at D = 0 and multiples of DRm. This requires the Fourier coefficient for D = 0, which is not accessible for a phase object (no contrast at D = 0). However, the ratio of the slopes of (D, m) at D = 0 and D = pDRm also provides this information. Furthermore, a characterization of γ(x) is possible, provided an assumption is made on its shape, using only the ratio of the Fourier coefficient (D, m) of two images a distance pDRm apart. Experiments with one‐ and two‐dimensional phase gratings and a mixed (amplitude and phase) two‐dimensional grating confirm that the partial Talbot effect approach is viable. It requires a reduced range of distances, and yields important results directly, obviating the need for computer fits. In particular, 8% of the beam intensity was found to have very low coherence in the vertical direction, probably due to monochromator imperfection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1600-5775 0909-0495 1600-5775 |
DOI: | 10.1107/S0909049504024811 |