A comparison between stand-alone left atrial appendage occlusion and resection as a method of preventing cardiogenic thromboembolic stroke

Objective The present study evaluated the differences between left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and left atrial appendage resection (LAAR) in terms of the safety and efficacy. Materials and methods From January 2018 to August 2022, 94 patients underwent a stand-alone LAAO, and 90 patients under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2024-03, Vol.72 (3), p.157-163
Hauptverfasser: Yoshimoto, Akihiro, Suematsu, Yoshihiro, Kurahashi, Kanan, Takahashi, Hidetomi, Inoue, Takafumi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The present study evaluated the differences between left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and left atrial appendage resection (LAAR) in terms of the safety and efficacy. Materials and methods From January 2018 to August 2022, 94 patients underwent a stand-alone LAAO, and 90 patients underwent stand-alone LAAR in our institution. All of these patients were included in this study. LAAO was performed via left mini-thoracotomy, and LAAR was performed via a left thoracoscopic approach. The patients’ characteristics and perioperative and postoperative data were obtained by retrospectively reviewing their medical records. Results The mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 10.2 (LAAO) and 66.2 ± 9.4 (LAAR) years old ( P  
ISSN:1863-6705
1863-6713
DOI:10.1007/s11748-023-01961-4