Optimizing Transitions of Care and Enhancing Surgical Education on Acute Care Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Survey Study

•147 trainees surveyed across 10 institutions had a response rate of 61%.•Institutional affiliations included academic, community, and hybrid surgery programs.•Respondees believe attending-supervised handoffs improved transitions of care.•Trainees endorse morning handoff as an opportunity to enhance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical education 2023-11, Vol.80 (11), p.1687-1692
Hauptverfasser: Melmer, Patrick D., Taylor, Ryan, Vera, Luis, Wong, Dayton, Santos, Ariel P., Chung, Tina, Sola, Jr Richard, Castater, Christine A., Nguyen, Jonathan, Nottingham, James M., Berg, Arthur F., Sleeman, Danny, Namias, Nicholas, Daley, Brian J., Procter, Levi, Aboutanos, Michel B., Davis, John M., Koganti, Deepika, Sciarretta, Jason D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•147 trainees surveyed across 10 institutions had a response rate of 61%.•Institutional affiliations included academic, community, and hybrid surgery programs.•Respondees believe attending-supervised handoffs improved transitions of care.•Trainees endorse morning handoff as an opportunity to enhance surgical knowledge. Critically ill and injured patients are routinely managed on the Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (ACS) service and receive care from numerous residents during hospital admission. The Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) program established by the ACGME identified variability in resident transitions of care (TC) while observing quality care and patient safety concerns. The aim of our multi-institutional study was to review surgical trainees' impressions of a specialty-specific handoff format in order to optimize patient care and enhance surgical education on the ACS service. A survey study was conducted with a voluntary electronic 20-item questionnaire that utilized a 5 point Likert scale regarding TC among resident peers, supervised handoffs by trauma attendings, and surgical education. It also allowed for open-ended responses regarding perceived advantages and disadvantages of handoffs. Ten American College of Surgeons-verified Level 1 adult trauma centers. All general surgery residents and trauma/acute/surgical critical care fellows were surveyed. The study task was completed by 147 postgraduate trainees (125 residents, 14 ACS fellows, and 8 surgical critical care fellows) with a response rate of 61%. Institutional responses included: university hospital (67%), community hospital-university affiliate (16%), and private hospital-university affiliate (17%). A majority of respondents were satisfied with morning TC (62.6%) while approximately half were satisfied with evening TC (52.4%). Respondees believe supervised handoffs improved TC and prevented patient care delays (80.9% and 74.8%, respectively). A total of 35% of trainees utilized the open-ended response field to highlight specific best practices of their home institutions. Surgical trainees view ACS morning handoff as an effective standard to provide the highest level of clinical care and an opportunity to enhance surgical knowledge. As TC continue to be a focus of certifying bodies, identifying best practices and opportunities for improvement are critical to optimizing quality patient care and surgical education.
ISSN:1931-7204
1878-7452
DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.06.025