Feasibility of omitting contralateral neck irradiation in patients with node‐negative sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma crossing the midline
Background Identifying the lymph node target volume in patients with node‐negative sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) crossing the midline poses a challenge. This study aims to address this. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinically N0 patients with tumors crossing the midline who receiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Head & neck 2023-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2237-2245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Identifying the lymph node target volume in patients with node‐negative sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) crossing the midline poses a challenge. This study aims to address this.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed clinically N0 patients with tumors crossing the midline who received elective neck irradiation (ENI) from two centers between 1999 and 2019. The main endpoint was regional relapse‐free survival (RRFS).
Results
We included 104 patients: 64 received bilateral ENI, and 40 received ipsilateral‐only ENI (median follow‐up time was 89.99 and 95.01 months, respectively). At 5 years, the RRFS rates were comparable (57.68% vs. 55.83%, p = 0.372), as were the contralateral RRFS (57.68% vs. 61.62%, p = 0.541). Five‐year OS, LRFS, and DMFS showed no significant difference between two groups.
Conclusions
Our findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting the potential for avoiding contralateral ENI in SNSCC patients with midline crossing tumors who undergo ipsilateral ENI, covering at least level II. Validation through future prospective studies is necessary. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hed.27462 |