Self-correction of posterior crossbite in childhood: a systematic review of long-term follow-up studies

The concept that posterior crossbite is not self-correcting has been controversial in the literature. To evaluate the incidence of self-correction of crossbite in different stages of dentition in childhood. A bibliographic search using the acronym PECOS was performed in five databases and in partial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of orthodontics 2023-11, Vol.45 (6), p.739-746
Hauptverfasser: Nascimento, Bianka Costa do, Santos, Cibelle Cristina Oliveira Dos, Santos, Milena Cristina Costa Dos, Normando, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The concept that posterior crossbite is not self-correcting has been controversial in the literature. To evaluate the incidence of self-correction of crossbite in different stages of dentition in childhood. A bibliographic search using the acronym PECOS was performed in five databases and in partial grey literature. Studies evaluating children with posterior crossbite in the deciduous or mixed dentition at initial examination and followed for at least 3 years were included. The data extraction of the studies included presents information on authorship, clinical characteristics, main results, and conclusions. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated through the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool. Among the 3045 references identified, seven cohort studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies evaluated patients in transition from deciduous to mixed, mixed to permanent, and deciduous to mixed dentition. Two studies had a low risk of bias, three had a moderate risk, and two had a high risk of bias. The results showed posterior crossbite self-correction frequencies ranging from 12.2 to 77.1% during the transition from primary to mixed dentition, approximately 16% from mixed to permanent dentition, and a range from 20 to 82.8% from deciduous to permanent dentition. The level of certainty of the evidence generated ranged from very low to moderate. The observational design of the studies, without adequate control for confounding factors, and non-classification of the samples considering the types or the severity of the posterior crossbite. The self-correction of posterior crossbite in childhood is possible. However, the results of this research do not allow to affirm how often the self-correction of posterior crossbite can occur. New studies that assess factors associated with the occurrence of self-correction of this malocclusion, including oral habits, may increase the certainty of the evidence. PROSPERO CRD42022311935.
ISSN:0141-5387
1460-2210
DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjad034