International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG) consensus on scoring of pediatric Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE)

To develop consensus statements for the scoring of pediatric drug induced sleep endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. The leadership group identified experts based on defined criteria and invited 18 panelists to participate in the consensus statement develop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2023-08, Vol.171, p.111627-111627, Article 111627
Hauptverfasser: Parikh, Sanjay R., Boudewyns, An, Friedman, Norman R., Schwartz, Seth Roslow, Baldassari, Cristina M., Benedek, Palma, Carr, Michele M., Chan, Dylan K., Chan, Kate C., Cheng, Alan T., Couloigner, Vincent, Diala, Obinna R., DeRowe, Ari, El-Hakim, Hamdy, Fayoux, Pierre, Hsu, Wei-Chung, Ishman, Stacey, Kirkham, Erin M., Mitchell, Ron B., Thevasagayam, Ravi, Lam, Derek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To develop consensus statements for the scoring of pediatric drug induced sleep endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. The leadership group identified experts based on defined criteria and invited 18 panelists to participate in the consensus statement development group. A modified Delphi process was used to formally quantify consensus from opinion. A modified Delphi priori process was established, which included a literature review, submission of statements by panelists, and an iterative process of voting to determine consensus. Voting was based on a 9-point Likert scale. Statements achieving a mean score greater than 7 with one or fewer outliers were defined as reaching consensus. Statements achieving a mean score greater than 6.5 with two or fewer outliers were defined as near consensus. Statements with lower scores or more outliers were defined as no consensus. A total of 78 consensus statements were evaluated by the panelists at the first survey – 49 achieved consensus, 18 achieved near consensus, and 11 did not achieve consensus. In the second survey, 16 statements reached consensus and 5 reached near consensus. Regarding scoring, consensus was achieved on the utilization of a 3-point Likert scale for each anatomic site for maximal observed obstructions of
ISSN:0165-5876
1872-8464
DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111627