A Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Analysis of Reimbursement Trends in Laryngology from 2000 to 2021

Objective The purpose of this study is to characterize Medicare reimbursement trends for laryngology procedures over the last two decades. Methods This analysis used CMS' Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Look‐Up Tool to determine the reimbursement rate of 48 common laryngology procedures, which wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2024-01, Vol.134 (1), p.247-256
Hauptverfasser: Xu, James R., Lorenz, Robert R., Mulligan, Kathleen M., Otteson, Todd D., Maronian, Nicole C., Manes, R. Peter, Lerner, Michael Z., Bryson, Paul C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The purpose of this study is to characterize Medicare reimbursement trends for laryngology procedures over the last two decades. Methods This analysis used CMS' Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Look‐Up Tool to determine the reimbursement rate of 48 common laryngology procedures, which were divided into four groups based on their practice setting and clinical use: office‐based, airway, voice disorders, and dysphagia. The PFS reports the physician service reimbursement for “facilities” and global reimbursement for “non‐facilities”. The annual reimbursement rate for each procedure was averaged across all localities and adjusted for inflation. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of each procedure's reimbursement was determined, and a weighted average of the CAGR for each group of procedures was calculated using each procedure's 2020 Medicare Part B utilization. Results Reimbursement for laryngology procedure (CPT) codes has declined over the last two decades. In facilities, the weighted average CAGR for office‐based procedures was −2.0%, for airway procedures was −2.2%, for voice disorders procedures was −1.4%, and for dysphagia procedures was −1.7%. In non‐facilities, the weighted average CAGR for office‐based procedures was −0.9%. The procedures in the other procedure groups did not have a corresponding non‐facility reimbursement rate. Conclusion Like other otolaryngology subspecialties, inflation‐adjusted reimbursements for common laryngology procedures have decreased substantially over the past two decades. Because of the large number of physician participants and patient enrollees in the Medicare programs, increased awareness and further research into the implications of these trends on patient care is necessary to ensure quality in the delivery of laryngology care. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 134:247–256, 2024 Medicare reimbursement has decreased for commonly billed laryngology procedures over the last two decades. Decreasing reimbursement can impact the delivery of quality otolaryngology care, so there should be further research and advocacy among otolaryngologists to improve physician reimbursement and ensure sustainability and growth of the specialty.
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.30874