Alternative protein sources: bacteria Methylococcus capsulatus concentrate, characteristic of composition and biological value

A promising growth vector of food protein production in the context of the Russian Federation's food sovereignty security is the use of microbial synthesis. Taking into consideration the proven promising use of biotechnological processes in the production of alternative protein sources, modern scientific research is focused, among other issues, on improving the technology of obtaining food microbial protein using a variety of substrates and strains-producers, as well as evaluating the consumer properties, food, biological value and safety of such products. of the research was to study and comparatively evaluate protein concentrate (PC) from bacteria Methylococcus capsulatus and basic food of animal and plant origin within the development of the technology of optimal in nutritional and biological value PC production. . Analysis of the nutritional and biological value of PC obtained from denucleinized and purified from cell walls biomass of methanoxidizing bacteria Methylococcus capsulatus (strain GSB-15) was carried out on 46 indicators, including estimation of protein content and amino acid composition, fat content and fatty acid composition, ash and moisture. Biological studies based on measuring of net protein ratio / net protein utilization were performed on 28 growing (between 25-50 days of life) male Wistar rats. Rats in the control group (n=14) received a semi-synthetic casein diet with a protein content of ~12% in calories, the test group (n=14) received a diet including an equivalent amount of PC protein. Body weight, feed intake, and fecal and urine nitrogen losses were measured during the experiment. The biological value and digestibility of protein were judged by coefficients of protein efficiency ratio, net protein ratio, true protein digestibility, true protein biological value, true net protein utilization. . The nutritional value study of PC showed high protein content - 69.0%, the share of fat, moisture and ash, accounted for 0.17, 9.5 and 14.4%, respectively. The carbohydrate content was 7.0% (of which mono- and disaccharides were