COVID-19 Vaccine Seroresponse Based on The Timing of The Primary Series; Pre- versus Post-Renal Transplantation

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses a serious risk to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal transplant. While COVID-19 vaccination is recommended before transplant, there are limited data comparing vaccine timing. Our aim is to evaluate serological responses to COVID-19 vaccines...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 2023-11, Vol.37 (11), p.e15072-e15072
Hauptverfasser: Weinberg, Amy R, Caeg, Calvin O, DePalma, Robyn, Hernandez, Frances, Rogers, Jackson H, Ibrahim, Hassan N, Bynon, Steve J, Nigo, Masayuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses a serious risk to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal transplant. While COVID-19 vaccination is recommended before transplant, there are limited data comparing vaccine timing. Our aim is to evaluate serological responses to COVID-19 vaccines pre- and post-renal transplant and the durability of antibody levels. We retrospectively evaluated the antibody response of adult renal transplant recipients who had received at least a primary series of the COVID-19 vaccine. The patients were divided into two groups based on the timing; pre- or post-transplant. Antibody titer levels were evaluated at least 4 weeks after vaccination for each group. Titer durability was assessed by calculating the median titer level of individuals. A total of 139 patients were identified between January 2019 and April 2022. Twenty-nine patients were excluded because of previous COVID-19 infection, and 15 patients were excluded each for insufficient vaccine doses and lack of titer data. Forty patients were included for the pre-transplant group and 40 for post-transplant. The number of pre-transplant patients who developed antibodies (39 patients, 97.5%) was significantly greater than the number of post-transplant patients (21 patients, 52.5%) with p 
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.15072