Is vision deterioration responsible for changes in the host’s behavior caused by eye flukes?
[Display omitted] •Eye flukes are suggested to change the defensive behavior of fish via vision impairment.•We tested whether changes in fish anti-predatory behavior depend on light conditions.•Trematodes Diplostomum pseudospathaceum manipulated Salvelinus malma behavior, making fish less vigilant.•...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for parasitology 2023-11, Vol.53 (13), p.731-738 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Eye flukes are suggested to change the defensive behavior of fish via vision impairment.•We tested whether changes in fish anti-predatory behavior depend on light conditions.•Trematodes Diplostomum pseudospathaceum manipulated Salvelinus malma behavior, making fish less vigilant.•The expression of behavioral changes did not differ under light or dark conditions.•A mechanism of manipulation other than vision impairment is likely to take place.
Trematodes localizing in the lenses of fish change the behavior of their hosts. These behavioral changes are widely suggested to be parasitic manipulations of host behavior aimed at increasing the possibility of eye flukes completing their life cycle. It is often assumed that fish change their behavior due to the vision deterioration caused by trematode larvae. We checked this assumption by testing Salvelinus malma infected with eye flukes (Diplostomum pseudospathaceum) under different lighting conditions. We suggested that if the parasite alters the host’s behavior through vision impairment, then in the dark (when fish do not rely on vision to navigate), the difference in the behavior of infected and uninfected fish would disappear. Eye flukes, indeed, changed fish behavior, making their hosts less vigilant. We believe this is the first evidence of possible parasitic manipulation in this study system. However, contrary to expectations, the difference in the behavior of infected and control fish was independent of the lighting conditions. Our results suggest that mechanisms of behavioral change other than vision impairment should be taken into account in this fish-eye fluke study system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7519 1879-0135 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.06.001 |