Conservation and divergence of flg22, pep1 and nlp20 in activation of immune response and inhibition of root development

Many pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) and their corresponding ligands have been identified. However, it is largely unknown how similar and different these ligands are in inducing plant innate immunity and affecting plant development. In this study, we examined three well characterized ligands in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant science (Limerick) 2023-06, Vol.331, p.111686-111686, Article 111686
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Yan, Cui, Junmei, Li, Meng, Yang, Rongqian, Hu, Yang, Yu, Xiaosong, Chen, Ying, Wu, Qiqi, Yao, Huipeng, Yu, Guozhi, Guo, Jinya, Zhang, Huaiyu, Wu, Shuang, Cai, Yi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) and their corresponding ligands have been identified. However, it is largely unknown how similar and different these ligands are in inducing plant innate immunity and affecting plant development. In this study, we examined three well characterized ligands in Arabidopsis thaliana, namely flagellin 22 (flg22), plant elicitor peptide 1 (pep1) and a conserved 20-amino-acid fragment found in most necrosis and ethylene-inducing peptide 1-like proteins (nlp20). Our quantitative analyses detected the differences in amplitude in the early immune responses of these ligands, with nlp20-induced responses typically being slower than those mediated by flg22 and pep1. RNA sequencing showed the shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was mostly enriched in defense response, whereas nlp20-regulated genes represent only a fraction of those genes differentially regulated by flg22 and pep1. The three elicitors all inhibited primary root growth, especially pep1, which inhibited both auxin transport and signaling pathway. In addition, pep1 significantly inhibited the cell division and genes involved in cell cycle. Compared with flg22 and nlp20, pep1 induced much stronger expression of its receptor in roots, suggesting a potential positive feedback regulation in the activation of immune response. Despite PRRs and their co-receptor BAK1 were necessary for both PAMP induced immune response and root growth inhibition, bik1 mutant only showed impaired defense response but relatively normal root growth inhibition, suggesting BIK1 acts differently in these two biological processes. •In this study, flg22, pep1 and nlp20 , three PAMP/DAMP elicitors from different sources were selected to explore the conservation and divergence of immune response and inhibition of root development, which results highlighted that (1) flg22 is more effective in Arabidopsis leaves, whereas pep1 boost the expression of its receptor leading to stronger responses in roots; (2) pep1 integrated hormone, cell division, cell cycle and development signals to inhibit root growth; (3) Elicitors treated bik1 mutant showed similar root growth inhibition but decreased ROS burst, suggesting that regulation of root inhibition might be different from that of immune response.
ISSN:0168-9452
1873-2259
DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111686