Myocardial Work in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Pressure-strain loop analysis is a novel echocardiographic technique to calculate myocardial work indices that has not been applied to patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM). We hypothesized that myocardial work indices differ between patients with ApHCM and those with non-ApHCM. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2023-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1043-1054.e3
Hauptverfasser: Peters, Matthew, Jan, M. Fuad, Ashraf, Muddasir, Sanders, Heather, Roemer, Sarah, Schweitzer, McKenzie, Adefisoye, James, Galazka, Patrycja, Jain, Renuka, Jahangir, Arshad, Khandheria, Bijoy, Tajik, A. Jamil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Pressure-strain loop analysis is a novel echocardiographic technique to calculate myocardial work indices that has not been applied to patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM). We hypothesized that myocardial work indices differ between patients with ApHCM and those with non-ApHCM. This study aimed to (1) evaluate myocardial work indices in patients with ApHCM compared with those with non-ApHCM, (2) describe associations with relevant clinical variables, and (3) examine associations with significant late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. We retrospectively identified 48 patients with ApHCM and 69 with non-ApHCM who had measurements of global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work, and global work efficiency. We evaluated available cardiac magnetic resonance imaging data on 34 patients with ApHCM and 51 with non-ApHCM. Multivariable regression models correcting for traditional cardiac risk factors were used to evaluate the associations of myocardial work indices with relevant clinical variables. Median GLS (−11% vs −18%, P 
ISSN:0894-7317
1097-6795
DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2023.06.013