Prevalence and risk factors of the use of physical restraint and impact of a decision support tool: A before-and-after study

Physical restraint is frequently used in intensive care units to prevent patients' life-threatening removal of indwelling devices. In France, their use is poorly studied. Therefore, to evaluate the need for physical restraint, we have designed and implemented a decision support tool. Besides de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nursing in critical care 2024-09, Vol.29 (5), p.987-996
Hauptverfasser: Dauvergne, Jérôme E, Ferey, Kim, Croizard, Véronique, Chauvin, Morgan, Mainguy, Nolwenn, Mathelier, Noeline, Jehanno, Anaëlle, Maugars, Nadège, Badre, Gaëtan, Maze, Françoise, Chartier, Marie, Vastral, Servane, Epain, Graziella, Baudiniere, Lucie, Ronceray, Mathilde, Lebidan, Mathias, Flattres, Delphine, Ambrosi, Xavier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Physical restraint is frequently used in intensive care units to prevent patients' life-threatening removal of indwelling devices. In France, their use is poorly studied. Therefore, to evaluate the need for physical restraint, we have designed and implemented a decision support tool. Besides describing the prevalence of physical restraint use, this study aimed to assess whether the implementation of a nursing decision support tool had an impact on restraint use and to identify the factors associated with this use. A large observational, multicentre study with a repeated one-day point prevalence design was conducted. All adult patients hospitalized in intensive care units were eligible for this study. Two study periods were planned: before (control period) and after (intervention period) the deployment of the decision support tool and staff training. A multilevel model was performed to consider the centre effect. During the control period, 786 patients were included, and 510 were in the intervention period. The prevalence of physical restraint was 28% (95% CI: 25.1%-31.4%) and 25% (95% CI: 21.5%-29.1%) respectively (χ  = 1.35; p = .24). Restraint was applied by the nurse and/or nurse assistant in 96% of cases in both periods, mainly to wrists (89% vs. 83%, p = .14). The patient-to-nurse ratio was significantly lower in the intervention period (1:3.0 ± 1 vs. 1:2.7 ± 0.7, p 
ISSN:1362-1017
1478-5153
1478-5153
DOI:10.1111/nicc.12945