A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient Factors on BREAST-Q Outcomes After Reduction Mammoplasty

As reduction mammoplasty rises in popularity, it will become increasingly important to understand the patient-reported outcome measurements associated with a successful operation. There has been a growing body of literature on BREAST-Q outcomes for patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty, but meta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2023-06, Vol.90 (6S Suppl 5), p.S667-S673
Hauptverfasser: Liao, Christopher D., Xia, Joyce, Wang, Katherine, Zhao, Kelley, Glickman, Laurence T., Agrawal, Nikhil A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:As reduction mammoplasty rises in popularity, it will become increasingly important to understand the patient-reported outcome measurements associated with a successful operation. There has been a growing body of literature on BREAST-Q outcomes for patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty, but meta-analyses of patient factors and BREAST-Q Reduction Module scores are lacking. This study sought to ascertain which patient factors were associated with improvements in BREAST-Q scores compared with preoperative levels. A literature review through August 6, 2021, was conducted using the PubMed database to select publications using the BREAST-Q questionnaire to evaluate outcomes after reduction mammoplasty. Studies examining breast reconstruction, breast augmentation, oncoplastic reduction, or breast cancer patients were excluded. BREAST-Q data were stratified by comorbidities, age, body mass index (BMI), complication rate, and resection weight. Among 14 articles and 1816 patients, the mean age ranged from 15.8 to 55 years, mean BMI ranged from 22.5 to 32.4 kg/m2, and bilateral mean resected weight ranged from 323 to 1845.96 g. Overall complication rate was 19.9%. On average, satisfaction with breasts improved by 52.1 ± 0.9 points (P < 0.0001), psychosocial well-being improved by 43.0 ± 1.0 points (P < 0.0001), sexual well-being improved by 38.2 ± 1.2 points (P < 0.0001), and physical well-being improved by 27.9 ± 0.8 points (P < 0.0001). The mean age was positively correlated with preoperative sexual well-being (Spearman rank correlation coefficient [SRCC]: 0.61, P < 0.05). Body mass index was negatively correlated with preoperative physical well-being (SRCC: -0.78, P < 0.01) and positively correlated with postoperative satisfaction with breasts (SRCC: 0.53, P < 0.05). The mean bilateral resected weight was significantly positively correlated with postoperative satisfaction with breasts (SRCC: 0.61, P < 0.05). No significant correlations were observed between complication rate and preoperative, postoperative, or mean change in BREAST-Q scores. Reduction mammoplasty improves patient satisfaction and quality of life as reflected by the BREAST-Q. Although preoperative or postoperative BREAST-Q scores may be individually influenced by age and BMI, these variables demonstrated no statistically significant effect on the average change between these scores. This literature review suggests that reduction mammoplasty delivers high satisfaction across a diverse range of p
ISSN:0148-7043
1536-3708
DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003471