Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Coronary Intervention: Rational or Just Trendy?
[...]interpretation of the multivariate predictors of outcomes (mortality and periprocedural bleeding) requires caution and may be of limited value in clinical decision-making. According to the 2021 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 2023-08, Vol.200, p.243-244 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [...]interpretation of the multivariate predictors of outcomes (mortality and periprocedural bleeding) requires caution and may be of limited value in clinical decision-making. According to the 2021 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization, the use of elective MCS during complex PCI is given a class IIB and level of evidence C recommendation.7 In this context, the decision to use MCS in elective high-risk PCI is routinely made based on best clinical judgment. [...]the decision to offer MCS in high-risk elective PCI must be made on an individual patient level with consideration of the risk:benefit ratio and local expertise. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.007 |