Seeing Numbers

At a quick glance, could people tell the difference between a group of 20 dots and a group of 30? What about 20 and 21? It seems like there must be a point at which they would simply be guessing, but recent research suggests otherwise. Given enough opportunities, people consistently perform better t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific American 2023-07, Vol.329 (1), p.17
1. Verfasser: Bradford, Nora
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:At a quick glance, could people tell the difference between a group of 20 dots and a group of 30? What about 20 and 21? It seems like there must be a point at which they would simply be guessing, but recent research suggests otherwise. Given enough opportunities, people consistently perform better than chance on this kind of task even when the numerical difference is extremely small, according to a study published in the Journal of Numerical Cognition. The researchers tested two mathematical frameworks for thinking about this situation: one with a hard limit on the fine numerical differences people can perceive and one without. They found their data fit better with the limitless model, suggesting that even with numbers as high as 100 versus 101, the task would become harder but not impossible.
ISSN:0036-8733
1946-7087
DOI:10.1038/scientificamerican0723-17b