Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR -Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301

Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with -mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2023-09, Vol.41 (26), p.JCO2300515-4217
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Byoung Chul, Ahn, Myung-Ju, Kang, Jin Hyoung, Soo, Ross A, Reungwetwattana, Thanyanan, Yang, James Chih-Hsin, Cicin, Irfan, Kim, Dong-Wan, Wu, Yi-Long, Lu, Shun, Lee, Ki Hyeong, Pang, Yong-Kek, Zimina, Anastasia, Fong, Chin Heng, Poddubskaya, Elena, Sezer, Ahmet, How, Soon Hin, Danchaivijitr, Pongwut, Kim, YuKyung, Lim, Yeji, An, Taewon, Lee, Hana, Byun, Hae Mi, Zaric, Bojan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with -mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1. Overall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; < .001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; = .116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles. Lazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of -mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.00515