Shifting to Authentic Assessments? A Systematic Review of Student Perceptions of High-Fidelity Assessments in Pharmacy

Despite becoming increasingly popular, there is no comprehensive review on high-fidelity assessments in pharmacy education that has a focus on the perceptions and experiences of students. This systematic review investigates the student acceptability of high-fidelity simulation for summative assessments in pharmacy education and provides recommendations regarding high-fidelity simulation practices. The search yielded 37 studies in total. The articles fell into 3 distinct categories: objective structured clinical examinations (N = 25); face-to-face simulation assessments (N = 9), and augmented reality assessments (N = 3). Most high-fidelity assessments were well received with most students agreeing they had a vital role in assessing the application of clinical knowledge, even though they are stressful. Students prefer high-fidelity assessments to be face-to-face rather than online and also prefer when simulated patients whom they are unfamiliar with are used. Students also expressed a need to be well-prepared for the assessment regarding the logistics of the exam and technology use. High-fidelity simulation is likely to be increasingly important in the assessment of the knowledge and skills of pharmacy students and student perception is an important factor to consider when developing such assessments. Reducing stress associated with high-fidelity assessments could include familiarizing students with task logistics or technology used prior to the assessment, using external simulated patients, and having face-to-face assessments and practice sessions.