Comparison of the effects of human fetal umbilical cord-derived hyaluronic acid and fibroblast-derived exosomes on wound healing in rats

Exosomes and hyaluronic acid influence tissue regeneration and may be used as an alternative to more conventional wound treatment methods. This study compared how well hyaluronic acid from the human umbilical cord and exosomes from fibroblast cells heal burn wounds in a preclinical model. Ninety-six...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Burns 2023-12, Vol.49 (8), p.1983-1989
Hauptverfasser: Ahmadpour, Fathollah, Salim, Mehdi Mohammadian, Esmailinejad, Mohammad Reza, Razei, Ali, Talebi, Samira, Rasouli, Hamid Reza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Exosomes and hyaluronic acid influence tissue regeneration and may be used as an alternative to more conventional wound treatment methods. This study compared how well hyaluronic acid from the human umbilical cord and exosomes from fibroblast cells heal burn wounds in a preclinical model. Ninety-six male Westar rats were used and allocated into four groups: The treatment group received 10% hyaluronic acid (HA); the treatment group received 300 l of exosome solution (EX); the treatment group received phenytoin (PC); the negative control group received no treatment (NC). The wound healing process was evaluated after 3, 6, 9, and 12 days. Histopathological analysis was done on the skin biopsy taken from the wounds. Re-epithelialization, inflammatory cells (PMNs), lymphocytes (LYMs), granulation tissue, collagen maturation (fibrosis), and eschar formation parameters were assessed for histopathological evaluation. On a scale from 0 to 4, each parameter received a score. Compared to the PC and NC groups, the median score for re-epithelialization was greater in the HA and EX groups (P 
ISSN:0305-4179
1879-1409
1879-1409
DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2023.05.011