Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida

Unnecessary cesarean deliveries lead to increased maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortalities. In 2020, Florida had a cesarean delivery rate of 35.9%, the third highest in the nation. An effective quality improvement strategy to reduce overall cesarean delivery rates is to decrease primary ces...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2023-12, Vol.229 (6), p.684.e1-684.e9
Hauptverfasser: Obure, Renice, Reid, Chinyere N., Salemi, Jason L., Rubio, Estefania, Louis, Judette, Sappenfield, William M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Unnecessary cesarean deliveries lead to increased maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortalities. In 2020, Florida had a cesarean delivery rate of 35.9%, the third highest in the nation. An effective quality improvement strategy to reduce overall cesarean delivery rates is to decrease primary cesarean deliveries in low-risk births (nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex). Of note, 3 nationally accepted hospital measures of low-risk cesarean delivery rates include the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex; Joint Commission; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine metrics. Comparing metrics is necessary because accurate and timely measurement is essential to support multihospital quality improvement efforts to reduce low-risk cesarean delivery rates and improve the quality of maternal care. This study aimed to assess differences in hospital low-risk cesarean delivery rates in Florida using 5 different metrics of low-risk cesarean delivery rate based on (1) risk methodology, nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex; Joint Commission; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine metrics, and (2) data source, linked birth certificate and hospital discharge records and hospital discharge records only. This was a population-based study of live Florida births from 2016 to 2019 to compare 5 approaches to calculating low-risk cesarean delivery rates. Analyses were performed using linked birth certificate data and inpatient hospital discharge data. The 5 low-risk cesarean delivery measures were defined as follows: nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex birth certificate; Joint Commission–linked used Joint Commission exclusions; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine–linked used Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions; Joint Commission hospital discharge with Joint Commission exclusions; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine hospital discharge with Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions. Nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex birth certificate was based on data from birth certificates and not using linked hospital discharge data. Designated as nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex, it does not exclude other high-risk conditions. The second and third measures (Joint Commission–linked used Joint Commission exclusions and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine–linked used Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions) use data elements from the full-linked dataset to designate nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex and excluded several high-risk conditions. The last 2 measur
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.016