Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy versus hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer
Objective Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the standard approach to lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are many different types. One of its approaches is complete thoracoscopic surgery (CTS), which may be less invasive because of low chest wall...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2024, Vol.72 (1), p.31-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the standard approach to lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are many different types. One of its approaches is complete thoracoscopic surgery (CTS), which may be less invasive because of low chest wall stress. This study compared the treatment outcomes of CTS and hybrid VATS lobectomy for NSCLC.
Methods
In total, 442 eligible patients with clinical N0 NSCLC underwent lobectomy between 2007 and 2016. Patients were classified into a group of patients who underwent CTS and a group of those who underwent hybrid VATS. Propensity score matching was performed between the two groups.
Results
There were 175 patients after matching. The median follow-up period in the CTS and hybrid VATS groups was 60 and 63 months, respectively. The CTS group showed less blood loss (CTS, 50 mL vs. 100 mL,
p
= 0.005), fewer complications (CTS, 25.7% vs. 36.6%,
p
= 0.037), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (CTS, 8 days vs. 12 days,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1863-6705 1863-6713 1863-6713 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11748-023-01947-2 |