Robot-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RP) compared with laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) have not been clearly established in ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) children and require review. We searched in the Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of robotic surgery 2023-10, Vol.17 (5), p.1891-1906
Hauptverfasser:	Chen, Zhuming, Xu, Huaiwen, Wang, Chaohui, Hu, Shuangjiu, Ali, Muhammad, Wang, Yang, Kai, Zhe
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Clinical trials Effectiveness Hydronephrosis Laparoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Minimally Invasive Surgery Pediatrics Review Robotic surgery Safety Subgroups Surgeons Surgery Urology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	The clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RP) compared with laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) have not been clearly established in ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) children and require review. We searched in the Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI database on 30 June 2022. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in RevMan 5.4 based on studies comparing RP versus LP in children with UPJO and subgroup analysis in children
ISSN:	1863-2491 1863-2483 1863-2491
DOI:	10.1007/s11701-023-01648-1