Is it safe for the spinal metastasis patients with preoperative deep vein thrombosis to use low-molecular-weight heparin before surgery? A prospective study
•Administration of LMWH before surgery did not increase the risk of perioperative bleeding.•The study revealed a prevalence of preoperative DVT of 8.0% in patients with spinal metastasis.•Preoperative D-dimer may not be a perfect predictor of preoperative DVT for patients with spinal metastasis. Spi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical neuroscience 2023-08, Vol.114, p.32-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Administration of LMWH before surgery did not increase the risk of perioperative bleeding.•The study revealed a prevalence of preoperative DVT of 8.0% in patients with spinal metastasis.•Preoperative D-dimer may not be a perfect predictor of preoperative DVT for patients with spinal metastasis.
Spine surgeons should weigh the risks of anticoagulants against their benefits in preventing deep venous thrombosis (DVT), as they may increase the risk of bleeding. Spinal metastasis patients undergoing decompression with fixation are at a high risk for DVT, which may occur preoperatively. Therefore, anticoagulants should be administered preoperatively. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of the administration of anticoagulants in treating spinal metastasis patients with preoperative DVT. Therefore, we prospectively investigated the prevalence of DVT in these patients. Patients who were diagnosed with preoperative DVT were included in an anticoagulant group. Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was administered. Patients without DVT were included in a non-anticoagulant group. Data on patient information, clinical parameters, blood test results, and bleeding complications were also collected. Moreover, the safety of anticoagulants was analyzed. The prevalence of preoperative DVT was 8.0%. None of the patients developed pulmonary thromboembolism. Furthermore, no significant differences in blood loss, drainage volume, hemoglobin levels, number of transfusions, or preoperative trans-catheter arterial embolization were observed between the two groups. None of the patients developed major bleeding. However, two patients experienced wound hematoma and one experienced incisional bleeding in the non-anticoagulant group. Therefore, LMWH is safe for spinal metastasis patients. Future randomized controlled trials should be conducted to evaluate the validity of perioperative prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in these patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0967-5868 1532-2653 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.05.015 |